''Yeah, 'Feminism' is in quotes there for good reason.
Equality is great, but thats not really what this is about. Its about a small bunch of PC whiners who suggest such outrageous things as 'there is an active debate online at the moment as to if women in the secular community should be either eye candy and f*ck toys for the privileged white men, or equal colleagues' (PZ Myers).
Well they to create this boogie man as a scare tactic to get 'harassment' policies in place.
Now if you had sane, stable and rational people in charge of such things, I wouldn't have a problem, but the thing is the PC whiners who want to be in charge of this basically want policies that echo their fringe feminist beliefs (yknow, things like there being a discussion if women are f*ck toys for privileged white men).
They also seem to want this policy to protect them from criticism. That is you shouldnt have the right to say things that might offend people at a conference, because thats almost as bad as physical assault.''
Tags: atheism, feminism, secularism
Comment
Debra Stevenson replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Daily Show takes on Christian persecution
Alexandros replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Oligofructose and obesity in the group Diet and Exercise Support Group
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Oligofructose and obesity in the group Diet and Exercise Support Group
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Steph S.'s discussion What if Richard Dawkins wasn't polite? in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Tom Sarbeck's discussion Men have sex and women make love. Or do they? in the group Secular Sexuality© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!
Join Atheist Nexus