Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on February 14, 2013 at 10:28pm LOL Point taken!
Comment by Napoleon Bonaparte on February 14, 2013 at 11:14pm I'm with you mate.
Comment by GOD'aye on February 14, 2013 at 11:29pm Tanx M8z! Just popped into head from nowhere: (Goes to mirror, checks head for signs of alien surgery scars, finds a couple of lice, considers the possibility of idea originated by lice)
Comment by GOD'aye on February 14, 2013 at 11:44pm All theistic institutions indoctrinate or proselytise newcomers, students and children.
Atheist/Secular institutions do not proselytise at all. Indoctrination and Proselytising minors should be considered and condemned as child abuse!
Comment by GOD'aye on February 14, 2013 at 11:53pm Here,(Australia) public school chaplains, mostly belong to an evangelical Christian body whose agenda is clearly to proselytise children. Though they are removed if caught proselytising on school time, they use other techniques such as recommending and organizing out of school activities to proselytise. We are currently trying to remove these chaplains from public schools.
As their activities and presence on school grounds in anti-constitutional.
Comment by GOD'aye on February 15, 2013 at 12:00am More Info for those interested: http://deewr.gov.au/national-school-chaplaincy-and-student-welfare-...
Comment by leveni on February 15, 2013 at 1:28am It's an interesting problem for atheism as a movement. Because as soon as you form an organized group that has a social structure, a set of rules and regulations, it is going to be seen as conducive to a church organization. Not because it has anything to do with religion, but because people will always associate organized atheism with organized religion. Eg: Meet-up.Wikipedia.
I also became guilty of thinking one atheist organization acts in the same way as a religious organization, when I read the AFA's definition of Atheism. My reason for this is, is they are redefining/reinterpreting the meaning of atheism to meet their own personal views on the subject. Much the same way the religious redefine/reinterpret their own religions to meet their own personal opinions.
Another problem I see that makes atheism easily confused with religion, is the number of Atheist organizations that exist. Different 'denominations' of atheism. Eg:BRIGHTS, Out Campaign, Sea of Faith. Plus all the internet forums could be classified as denominational.
Another problem is the meaning of the word atheism. It is constantly being redefined.
1. (1604) atheist, (g) (* synonyms *) without, God, or beleeuing.
2. (1768) Atheist: denying God, one that denies God
3. (1856) ATHEIST. One who denies the existence of God.
4. (1970's) The AFA (Atheist Foundation of Australia). 'Atheism is the acceptance that there is no credible scientific or factually reliable evidence for the existence of a god, gods or the supernatural.'
5. (1994) ATHEISM: originally used in Greece of all those who, whether they believed in a GOD or not, disbelieved in the official GODS of the State:(This one is quiet miss-guiding).
Redefining what atheism is, is akin to religious people redefining what God or Jesus is.
My take on it is along the lines of Post-theism. Hopefully both theism and atheism will disappear.
Comment by GOD'aye on February 15, 2013 at 6:13am Yes, so true Leveni, I'm striking this issue all the time on such sites as: http://www2b.abc.net.au/tmb/Client/TopicList.aspx?b=87&dm=1
Where I constantly argue with theists and sometimes Creationists as goiday_myd. I'm continually having to correct theist's views of atheism, where some atheists with Hitler and Stalin, though neither of them were truly atheists.
Same with the Creationists where they try to pretend that Evolution is an atheist plot against God instigated by Charles Darwin and atheist cohorts. They keep forgetting that Charles Darwin was a Christian who ventured into agnosticism, but, not an atheist. They cannot understand how other Christians can resolve Evolution and their Christianity. As in my arguments on: http://www.debate.org/ as Sagey, I haven't debated yet, though I've been making lots of comments and hounding a creationist who named himself FritzStammberger on such arguments as: http://www.debate.org/debates/There-is-proof-of-evolution-no-proof-... Just doing a bit of trolling there for the hell of it. LOL
Comment by leveni on February 15, 2013 at 7:54am Compass!!, Is it still going? I saw a few episodes in the late 80's. I remember I quiet liked it, even though it had a religious aspect to it, it was pretty tame.
The difference in how creationists think and how people with analytical minds think, creates a problem when the two communicate with each other. Creationists already know the whole answer. Those with analytical minds look at each point and try to prove or disprove each point. There is no common ground in the two mind sets.
Also the creationists understanding of the word 'believe' in regards to creationism and the meaning of the word 'believe' in "I believe evolution to be true" are quiet different. One of the 'believes' is based on facts the other on fiction. So I think it's impossible to have a real debate between the two. But it would be fun to do so.
Comment by GOD'aye on February 15, 2013 at 8:02am Well Yes, Leveni, Compass is still alive (just), they've put it on earlier, likely to attract new viewers. I've been trolling the forum for a couple of years now. When I first started it was full of Creationists and theists attacking a few atheists. Now it has almost become my personal blog. Practically killed off all Creationists and only a few theists remain and one agnostic (Suri). U r welcome to add any comment or criticism of my posts or cheeky style. I'm all up for improvement. Maybe you could start your own thread/blog there as well. I believe that even though it is a lowly program forum, it does get the occasional new viewer, so I am assisting in the education of those newcomers along with the brilliant Yamin, Maudib and a few other atheists.

James H. Enander Online


Napoleon Bonaparte Online


Loren Miller Online

The Flying Atheist Online
Posted by Dan Meadows on May 21, 2013 at 8:50am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by Larry Taylor on May 20, 2013 at 8:15pm 5 Comments 1 Like
OK. I am venting. My mother died two weeks ago. She was a “god fearing christian.” Before her death she refused all medical treatment. She wanted to be left alone. She even refused to speak with my brother who is a methodist minister. He is a pip, let me tell you! I suspect she did not believe, but a woman born in her time could not and did not state her actual beliefs. This is the opening salvo to all christians; FUCK YOU! I had so many people come and tell…
ContinuePosted by Christy Stewart on May 20, 2013 at 2:17pm 6 Comments 0 Likes
This probably should not have shocked me as much as it did (especially since I am in Texas). I actually thought my coworkers were playing a joke on me because they know I am an atheist. Sadly, this was no joke. This actually happened.
I work in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who admit patients are general MDs. (Psychiatrists see patients after admission) Yesterday evening we received several calls from irate parents. A new doctor who was doing admissions yesterday actually…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 1:09pm 3 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this,
Nathan Young,
No Jason Torpy it is you that should be banned for promoting atheism, a belief that has no foundation in reality and zero proof behind it. The letter was a mockery of your atheist beliefs. I request to the board here that they remove Jason for his unverifiable beliefs in atheism for which he has no proof other than his arrogance. The letter was a mockery of atheism. Atheism is stupid and it should be mocked and it…
Continue© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!
Join Atheist Nexus