Atheist Nexus Logo

Randall Smith's Comments

Comment Wall (9 comments)

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

At 6:04am on May 4, 2015, Saul Dobney said…

Thanks for the welcome. I'm hoping to find some people who might be interested in reading the book (happy to send out a copy).

At 1:39pm on May 2, 2015, Aaron Nye said…

Thanks for the welcome :)

At 5:34pm on April 29, 2015, Ima Hitchfan said…

Thanks Randall for the warm welcome ! 

At 8:33am on April 29, 2015, Christine Alcantara said…

Thank you so much for welcoming me to this community.

At 8:59am on April 26, 2015, Ki Smith said…
At 2:25pm on April 7, 2015, Pranavi said…

Thank you for the welcome!

At 11:29am on April 7, 2015, Mary Hawthorne said…
Hey ya! Thanks much
At 10:20am on April 4, 2015, Lou Flores said…

thank you :)

At 5:17am on February 2, 2015, Mike Newdow said…


There have now been three Supreme Court cases dealing with the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) as it pertains to federal laws. A review of the opinions show that RFRA was strongly supported by 8 of 8 justices in Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita (2005), by 9 of 9 justices in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) and by 9 of 9 justices in Holt v Hobbs (2015). Thus, the time is ripe for Atheists to challenge being essentially forced to bear the message, "In God We Trust" – in violation of their religious beliefs - as the price to pay for simply choosing to carry the nation's currency in their pockets.


In fact, in the seven federal circuits where "In God We Trust" has yet to be litigated, challenges are now being organized to do just that. Accordingly, I am searching for individuals and organizations who wish to serve as plaintiffs and who are from those seven circuits (i.e., who are from Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia or Wisconsin). If you or anyone you know would like to participate, please email contact information – including city and state of residence - to as soon as possible.


Because the Supreme Court has indicated that it is more concerned about constitutional guarantees when children are involved, those who wish to protect their children from the government’s religious transgressions are especially encouraged to write. Please be assured that we will move for a court orders to keep the names of families with children under seal. (To date, those motions have always been granted, and – as far as I know – the families’ names have always remained undisclosed.)


Thank you.


- Mike 


PS - Please pass this on to any others who you think might have an interest. Thanks, again.

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon


Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service