So tired of religious apologists asking me to show evidence for the non-existence of their particular god. I've asked them how they would go about showing evidence for the non-existence of the dragon in Carl Sagan's garage or Russell's celestial teapot. They assert that the analogy is false, but don't explain how. They use words like 'logic' or 'inference' as if they were magic charms without fully understanding what these words mean. It's not unlike superstitious primitives from a cargo cult making mockups of radio towers, runways, and rifles in the hopes that they can magically make the cargo come back. Theists have no idea how logic works. They wave about the terminology of logic like mockup bamboo props hoping to conjure validity.