Comment
Comment by Sentient Biped on July 17, 2011 at 12:07am
Comment by Brian Bridson on July 16, 2011 at 9:53pm
Comment by Sentient Biped on July 16, 2011 at 9:41pm Brian,
No argument from me, just wanted to express what I know some will say. I struggle with the concept of catholic (or theist) "enablers". The complartmentalism can be interesting. As far as Im concerned, the Vatican should be converted to a museum for art and the study of religious demogoguery. I also take issue with people who continue to throw money into the golden collection plates, all so they can eat a tasteless cracker.
Comment by Brian Bridson on July 16, 2011 at 7:08pm Sentient...thanks for your comments. Firstly, I have made the text changes. Secondly...while I hear what you are saying about putting catholics in their place, I disagree with you. With all the nonsense and immorality being committed by this corrupt organization, not even its members can be kept from knowing about it. And yet, despite this, its flock continue to follow and add more money to the coffers of the vatican.
James, I do agree with what you have said regarding the fact that commonsense also dictates that these relics of the Roman Empire should be left to their death throes while the rest of us move on. But with respect to American politics, I am not familiar enough to comment.
And yes, their support and protection provided to pedophiles is a mark of their true despicable nature. If that in itself is not enough to make people pack their bags and leave, they deserve no more respect than their invalid beliefs.
Comment by James M. Martin on July 16, 2011 at 6:04pm I like this post. The writer suggests but does not precisely define the nature of the problem. It is simply that all of the so-called social conservative "issues" (I can hear Wittgenstein rattling in his grave) are grounded in faith, and science and reason tells us that these people are 100% dead wrong on both of two fronts: abortion and LGBT orientation. In America, everyone has rights, but not pregnant women or homos. That horrid Bachmann woman is such an ideologue she shouldn't be dreaming up Constitutional amendments to ban Shariah, she should be preaching in a megachurch, which is a lot more lucrative than being a Congresswoman. Mrs. Marcus Bachmann, like that butt of a savage joke, Mr. Rick Santorum, simply spouts rote Tea Party talking points, relying upon Joe Goebbels' suggestion that anyone can be convinced of anything if you repeat a falsehood early and often enough.
But the worst crime of the Catholic Church is its protection of pedophile priests, sending them to brief rehab (in complete ignorance of the well known truth that pedophile recidivism is high), then placing them in another parish where they sin all over again. Anyone else would be shut down by Eric Holder, the A.-G., but the RCC has diplomatic status by treaty with the U.S. Duh, how do you think the justice obstructor-in-chief vacations in Castle Gondolfo. It was his reward for keeping governments out of Vatican files.
Comment by Sentient Biped on July 16, 2011 at 4:44pm Brian,
Enjoyed your editorial. Passionate and well written.
If I may quibble, it is in support of you. Just a couple of points -
"Put catholics in their place" puts all catholic people in the same category. It alienates catholic followers who are supportive of the same things that you are. I don't have an ideal substitute, but might say "Put catholic bishops in their place" or "Put catholic conservative activists in their place". Or to be McCarthyesque, "Put catholic operatives in their place."
The second point is the line "Catholics were the first to introduce the idea of anti-bullying." I suspect that is not true. There may have been catholics in there on the ground floor, but I doubt that "catholics" deserve as much credit as this line gives them, especially without attribution.
My other point is editorial. I found it difficult to keep track of what were your words, and what were quotes. It's easy to make quotes italic, and keep your own text as helvitica, so that the reader doesn't attribute to you something that you actually are against.
Please take this as supportive of your words and cause.
Daniel
Debra Stevenson commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
Loren Miller commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
James M. Martin replied to James M. Martin's discussion Bryan Fischer, American Family Association, Says Military Rape Crisis Caused by Homosexuals in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
Joan Denoo replied to James M. Martin's discussion Bryan Fischer, American Family Association, Says Military Rape Crisis Caused by Homosexuals in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
Joan Denoo replied to James M. Martin's discussion Bryan Fischer, American Family Association, Says Military Rape Crisis Caused by Homosexuals in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.
You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!
Join Atheist Nexus