Shutter Island: You invest 2.5 hours and get 3 minutes in return

U.S. Marshalls go to Shutter Island, a mental hospital for the
criminally insane, to find an escaped prisoner and stumble across a
bigger mystery. Brief, but frequent moments of shoddy writing and
cinematography damage the experience of what might have otherwise been
a memorable and insightful film.

United States Marshalls Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Chuck
Aule (Mark Ruffalo) are dispatched to Shutter Island to investigate the
disappearance of a patient who seems to have evaporated into thin air.
Doctor Cawley (Ben Kingsley) shows them around, tells them about the
facility and the patient, but seems to be hiding his true motives.
While on the island, some of Teddy’s personal and war experiences come
to the surface, affecting his ability to investigate effectively. A
storm, both environmental and emotional, overtakes the grounds and
reveals some painful truths.

Shutter Island has introspective moments that could shine lights on
long forgotten skeletons in anyone’s closet. Sadly, just as one might
be forced to ask themselves hard questions, the light goes out.
Occasionally, it is because the writing or execution of the lines is
unnatural. Even more frustrating are the dollar store green screen
visuals.
Director Martin Scorsese and director of photography Robert Richardson
pay meticulous attention to the lighting, framing and shadow in Shutter
Island. Each location is lit to draw the viewers attention where the
director wants it, where the story demands it be, and creates a deeply
entrenching mood for the audience.

Then out of nowhere, while the audience is sitting obediently in the
visual trench Scorsese dug for us, he throws dirt on our heads. The
carefully lit scenery is replaced by green screen effects that would be
rejected by the producer of any late night show. There are a few dream
or fantasy sequences that are technically well done but leave the
audience scratching their heads. Occasionally, Scorsese pays better
attention to how the scene looks than how it is acted or written and it
distracts from the overall film.

Much of Shutter Island relies on the relationship between Teddy and
Chuck. For the most part, their relationship, streams smoothly across
the screen. Just as you buy into the silky ride, Leonardo DiCaprio,
Mark Ruffalo, and writer Laeta Kalogridis throw tires onto the road.
They aren’t interesting; they are the nuisances of bad acting and
unpolished writing. The phraseology used by Teddy is inconsistent and
bizarre. Even when Teddy‘s dialogue is written within the believable
range, DiCaprio occasionally overacts relatively tame scenes. Ruffalo
and DiCaprio’s consistency lack chemistry or sincerity. As the film
progresses, the nature of their relationship changes, but the feeling
between them does not.

My biggest frustration when I reached the end of Shutter Island is that
I never feel attached to the characters. The use of fantasy and the
obvious secrets throughout the story made me feel like the filmmakers
were keeping me at an uncomfortable distance.

Even given all the problems, Shutter Island does leave the audience
with something to think and talk about at the end. For those of us who
have skeletons hung amongst our skinny jeans, the ending may give pause
and may even force introspection. My husband and I discussed the
ending and its meaning for nearly two hours.

Shutter Island’s pay off did not feel worth the two and a half hour
investment of my time. We can ask ourselves the same question and have
the same honest discussion without the context of Shutter Island’s
story. There is little, besides the last three minutes of the film, to
really grasp onto as powerful, entertaining or interesting. It might
be good for a discussion group but barring that, it has little to offer
a general audience.

Views: 8

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Rayray on March 20, 2010 at 10:31pm
Poor Felch, he is so miserable. He must have ran out of valid things to complain about.
Comment by LaRae Meadows on February 23, 2010 at 1:57pm
Felch, no matter how often you stomp around and complain like a child, you do not determine what is on my blog. So take your toys and go home before you pee your pants.
Comment by Фелч Гроган on February 23, 2010 at 5:06am
There's simply no end to your inanity is there ? I guess you spent 2.5 hours with a thesaurus on this bowl of nothing. How come everyone else can figure out that special interest items should get posted in special interest groups and you can't ? Oh I see... You're from California. It's all about you.

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

John Jubinsky posted photos
59 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
2 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
3 hours ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
3 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
4 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
4 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
4 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is god good?
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
5 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service