-are not mysogynists
-are not religious or influenced by the bible for their position
If you make up pseudo science to "prove" a fetus so inferior to a human, are you any different than a creationist?
What is the hard science that supports the idea that a fetus is not a human, and thus has no more rights than a blob of cancer, or an appendix?
At what point, precisely, does a fetus become a human? Birth? Is a fetus not a human 1 second before birth? What is the science behind this?
We, as atheists, constantly hammer creationists for their pseudo science based on their cherished belief system. How is a pro-choice stance not a cherished belief system with no basis in science as well, exactly?