I've been thinking a lot about large topics related to small objects, like symbolism and esthetics ("why yes, my knitting a potholder does make a political statement!", that sort of thing)
Because so much of my free time is devoted to being creative in one form or another, and my favored craft is jewelry, which is heavily gendered, I have taken up residence at the intersection of feminism, crafter-dom. In the last couple of weeks, I've been wondering why so many craft bloggers (that I've come across) are Christian, explicitly or implicitly. This got me thinking whether this has anything to do with the larger crafting "communities", or US culture. It also made me wonder "where are the atheist/secular crafters"? Apparently, they are right here :)
Given my predilections towards traditionally feminine designs and my fascination with all things Victorian, I keep mentally going back to 2nd wave feminist inquiries into 19th century domestic culture. Crafting, even jewelry, has been around *far* longer than Victorian era, but it's my theory that there was something unique about the way goods were made, who made them, and why in the Victorian/Edwardian time periods that gave us "arts and crafts" as we know them today. This was also a highly religious era, at least ostensibly. Lotta stuff, lotta women making it, and a lotta scripture flying around. Sounds like many crafter communities today. Not all, but many.
It's a big, messy, inclusive palette of ideas, and I'm still working on cogent theses, but it's really fun to think about. I'm linking below to my actual craft blog, Venice in Winter, so people can stroll in and see what I've been thinking about.
I enjoy dialog, so question away, commiserate, comment, whatever! I reserve the right to ignore the rude, but hopefully that won't be a problem :)
Comment
Comment by Sonja M. Williams on September 24, 2012 at 9:57pm Why so many craft bloggers are Christian? I think I know the answer. It is a well-known fact that Christianity praises women who are industrious. Check out Proverbs 31: 10-31 (The Virtuous Wife) Many times, I have read/heard Christians using these bible verses to praise their mother, grandmother, spouse etc.
Comment by Glen Rosenberg on September 24, 2012 at 5:58pm Lillie, I am sure you are correct. Twain said you show me where a man gets his corn pone and I will show you where he gets his pinions.
And opposing self-interest is part of the human condition. Although a person who has made her bed has to sleep in it cuz the floor aint none to inviting.
Comment by Glen Rosenberg on September 24, 2012 at 5:56pm Liz, I wonder whether the author discussing Dickens is correct in the notion that he supports those well defined victorian/bourgeouis roles. In support the author says that the women who depart from the norm come to ruin. That may be satire.
I think there is something to what you say. Indoctrination defines roles and give status and even the lower echelon insists on guarding its place. Religion in general makes the universe intelligible, fairy-tale explanation notwithstanding. Further it defines a place for each person and steps and stages of life which in turn provide comfort, I suppose. And it is so very difficult to upset the apple cart of a person's world view.
Your idea of women protecting their place in the hierarchy finds support in the era of civil war america in which the lowest rung whites were the most vicious in persecuting blacks. Also ultra-opposed to emancipation which would of course threaten their status as the penultimate nadir of society.
As far as biologies' role I really do not know. Far too often however when we analyze civilization we ascribe inequitable conditions to "environmental factors". What of the thing in itself? Dont things become the way they are at least in part because of their intrinsic qualities. NATURE. Improve civilization definitely. Could not agree more.
Comment by Lillie on September 24, 2012 at 5:26pm This is a very interesting discussion separate from arts and crafts. (Although that is interesting, too.) Glen, I have always wondered how women married to conservatives can vote Republican and I think it is an economic dependency.
Comment by Liz on September 24, 2012 at 5:09pm Same here with anecdotal stuff... though there's actual scholarship on crafting, blogging, craft-blogging, and the rest of the topics I touched on, but damn if I'm going to trawl databases on my free time :)
I think you are right in some women in religiously/culturally colored subordinate roles guarding their low status. My knee-jerk is to say maybe it's a case of "it's small but it's *mine*", a la Victorian "spheres" (http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/dickens/ge/farrell2.html - mind you it's been a while since I read that, and I hope it doesn't contradict any of this!)
The indoctrination creates a hierarchy, which always conveniently has someone below you, no matter how low your status is. So perhaps there's a comfort of sorts in that, even though Mrs. X is considered essentially a large child in her marriage (!) she has a definite place, and that place relieves her of having to define herself? Tricky territory...
I doubt there's a biological drive against equality. So much of what is "the way things are" is hanging on hooks of culture that I can't personally throw my weight behind that idea. Even if there may be, biology is certainly not destiny :) Stuff can and should be improved!
Comment by Glen Rosenberg on September 24, 2012 at 4:45pm Liz, I can only offer anecdotal evidence and it is frustrating to me, but religious women guard their religious/patriarchal roles zealously. I express ideals about equality, egalitarianism, no differentiation in work and they defend status quo. Men have their work, women different work. Men are to be dominant and controlling, women are to be submissive. And the greater the religious indoctrination the greater the satisfaction with the way things are.
Is this largely the way women feel who have been raised in religious pits? I dont know. But it makes me wonder whether there is a biological impetus against equality and in favor of the way things were and continue to be in much of the world.
You made me learn an acronym. I say why do it yourself when others can do it for you.
Comment by Liz on September 24, 2012 at 4:28pm Thanks, Glen! Even though I'm coming at it from a DIY enthusiast's perspective, the larger issues (ie gender roles) reach out so far. There was an old feminist slogan that still holds true for gender considerations, and even with religious vs secular matters: "The personal is political"!
Comment by Glen Rosenberg on September 24, 2012 at 3:53pm Liz, even though I've very little interest in arts and crafts what you have written makes me think about gender roles. Specifically how much of entrenched patriarchy/religiously defined roles are cultural and how much are they innate.
Debra Stevenson replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Daily Show takes on Christian persecution
Debra Stevenson replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Daily Show takes on Christian persecution
Alexandros replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Oligofructose and obesity in the group Diet and Exercise Support Group
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Oligofructose and obesity in the group Diet and Exercise Support Group
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Steph S.'s discussion What if Richard Dawkins wasn't polite? in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!
Join Atheist Nexus