Atheist Nexus Logo
Why do religious people (or any people) consider good conclusions to bad situations to be miracles? Going about daily life on an average scale free of tragedy is not a rare, precious thing. It is the default. The real "miracle", or "anti-miracle", is that such a tragic and terrible thing happened in the first place. The odds are against planes crashing, being held at gunpoint, or being attacked by a shark. Just because one of these life-threatening situations ends in survival does not make it a good thing. The fact that such a thing happened in the first place is what is rare and out of the ordinary. This is more suited to being called a "miracle" or an anti-miracle in that it is a negative occurrence and not a positive one. Surviving falling out of a twentieth-story window is not good; the fact that one fell out of the window in the first place is bad.

Believing that a god forced this tragic, improbable, and dangerous situation on you just to "spare" your life with a denouement of survival is ridiculous. Such an occurrence is a not a net gain, but a net loss. While countless other people go about their usual lives without being trapped in a burning building or falling out of a rollercoaster, you defy the odds and become the one who does. If a "miracle" is a rare good thing, an anti-miracle is its evil twin. Being the only survivor of a plane crash that killed 200 people is not a "miracle", it is an anti-miracle.

Views: 73

Tags: anti-miracles, faith, miracles, survival, tragedy


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Just Trying on June 3, 2014 at 1:12pm

I've never thought of the term anti-miracle before. Interesting way of putting this.

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon


Nexus on Social Media:

¬© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service