Koran is only for the Arabs, not for other nations or races. It is an Arabic book. In Koran, there are:

27. We have cited in this Koran for mankind every ideal; that they may take heed (Throngs).

28. An Arabic Koran, without any defect, so they may become righteous (Throngs).

All men of the world do not say in Arabic. In Koran, there are rise and fall of some races (ESP. A’ad, Samud etc.), not of any others. When the Koran was being revealed, was there no nation or race in the world without A’ad-Samud? Was there no India or any Indian races then?

Views: 75

Tags: Drishtantoism

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Pat on November 21, 2012 at 12:43pm

Loren, you forgot one other one. The Ottoman Empire. Islamic in nature, and ruled by Turks - who are definitely not Arab. Add to that, we also have Iran (ancient Persia), Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Eritrea, Somalia, etc., etc.  The koran is a nonsensical magic book, the same as the jewish torah, and christian new testament. And, I might add, plagiarized in large part from the latter two. All three are available to the superstitious and gullible to interpret anyway they want, or worse, believe in someone else's interpretation. 

Comment by Loren Miller on November 21, 2012 at 9:50am

If the quran is only for the Arabs, why so much talk about new caliphates in non-Arab nations, including the United States?  Why is it that islam dominated Spain, a definitely non-Arab state, for over 700 years?  And why do followers of islam make their teachings available essentially worldwide?

The statement that quran is strictly for Arabs is nonsense.

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

John Jubinsky posted photos
47 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
2 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
3 hours ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
3 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
4 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
4 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
4 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is god good?
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
5 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service