Do men doctors actually understand patients who are not men?

Could it be men doctors (MDs) don't understand how
conditions of wellness or disease manifest in women
and children at all so they don't bother to interpret
salient data in these patients. Instead, ritual
proceedures make up the main stay of medical
care for women (ceasarian section operations,
masdectomys and hysterectomies) and children
(Thimerisol laden vaccines, ritalin , fluoride, silver
and mercury tooth fillings which expand and contract unlike
the enamel and dentin they fill and silver nitrate inoculations
for the eyeballs of new borns). More please, give me more...kind sir.

Views: 607

Tags: cooler, water

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Clarence Dember on August 10, 2011 at 9:09am
Hi. Rob van Senten. Do you habitually employ calumny as an
introduction to wiki inks to info about scientific research you
have not read? Are you ignorant, a conduit of
misinformation, or both?
Comment by Rob van Senten on August 10, 2011 at 8:27am

@Clarence Dember, 

 

Thanks to Peter J. D'Adamo you say, isn't he's the guy from the widely discredited/criticized "Blood Type Diet" ? 

 

Me, I prefer actual science above quackery, quackery might theoretically become proper science if the people involved do their homework. Unfortunately, when people are selling products before they did the required research to proof that their hypothesis is true I respectfully decline the opportunity to spend my money on quackery.

 

Perhaps mr. D'Adamo is right, if only he would take the care to do the science he might one day become more then the quack that he is now.

 

Quackery doesn't have to be proven wrong to be quackery, it needs only to be proven that it's an unproven hypothesis.

Comment by Clarence Dember on August 10, 2011 at 8:23am
Delete Comment
My grand father spent the last years of his life with macular damage because the
eye drops for gloucoma work well on Caucasians and the FDA has had Cannabis
listed as a dangerous narcotic with no medical benefits. He was a gardener for
New York City and could have grown his own cannabis to prevent blindness if it
were legal to do so. The heavy handed and wrong headed autocratic corporate
lobby lock step of the FDA does more harm than good. Witness aspartame
and sucralose and the suppression of stevia for years. Autocratic despotism can
not defeat certainty. I hope to live long enough to see the FDA dismantled. I don't have anything good to say about professional guilds which work against science and innovation the way the AMA has done in it's history since it's inception.
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 10, 2011 at 7:49am
Thanks to Peter J. D'Adamo N.D. I am now able to identify foods condiments and beverages which work with my blood type to promote nutrient uptake and waste elimination by every part of my body.
Comment by Avicenna on August 9, 2011 at 7:26pm
Very few drugs have that. And the FDA isn't the only drug testing body in the world. If I want data on black people I will look at South Africa's drug testing or if I want it in India there are ginormous amounts of indian drug tests.

And in some cases side effects don't matter. Do you really think a terminal cancer case cares about morphine's side effects?
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 9, 2011 at 5:12pm
Hello Avicenna. FDA approval of a drug entails finding a population for the study where the drug being tested has efficacy without a lot of sideeffects contraindicating it's use. Because of this certain drugs work better in one population over another. Drugs are tools. They are supposed to a means to cogent end not habituation as in the case of Methadone.
Comment by Avicenna on August 9, 2011 at 11:27am
I am not biased towards allopathy, it's just that reality is. Reality seems adamant that "medicine works" while "quackery doesn't". They aren't real doctors any more so than calling a astrologer a real scientist.

And do you really think that real doctors don't know any of this? Hint... the naturopaths and homoepaths and alt medicine practitioners all quote OUR PAPERS incorrectly.

The major changes to healthcare for chronic disease is usually eating better and exercising. Second hand smoke is so dilute and filtered that there is no carcinogens. You are more likely to get cancer from walking around a city or being near a wood burning fire.

Homeostasis doesn't mean what you think it means. Homeostasis is the idea that the body attempts to resist any changes from the normal by a system of checks and balances. So for instance if you run fast and need oxygen in your blood you breathe faster and your heart pumps faster ensuring blood is oxygenated.

A lot of medicine is maintainance of homeostasis. From anti-acids to xanthines many are aimed at maintaining the normal function of the body.
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 9, 2011 at 9:41am
One idea I find useful is that one must act as an acommodating host to harbor disease. So, let's take cancer of the intestines and Colin for example. Nitrate preservatives become deadly carcinogens in the body when you eat them. Nitrous amides. I believe they are called. Anyway, if my excuse for eating them is I like cold cuts and meats preserved I this manner and I go on to make a staple diet from such sources of food it is easy to see I put in place processes which may lead to cancerous outcomes.
I become a better host for disease process. The same goes for other behaviors like tobacco smoking. This activity puts things in the body which have pejorative processes leading to cellular damage over time. If one avoids these behaviors one can still succumb from second hand smoke or MTBE contaminated drinking water. Do you think the dynamic process of homeostasis is magical thinking or is it a practical idea?
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 9, 2011 at 9:28am
Comment by Jeremy Raines.

"Do human veterinarians understand patients that aren't human?
Scary stuff, man."
Clarence replied:
"I think that there is evidence people are winding up in professions where there is a better economic fit than a vocational acumen and commitment, yes."
Comment by Clarence Dember on August 9, 2011 at 9:21am
Hi Grace. One of the reasons people get type 2 diabetes is consumption of saturated fats as a regular dietary choice. Their cells become made of fats which do not allow insulin to work properly. Also drinking excessively can damage the islets of Langerhans which does not bode well for the regulation of sugar by insulin sucretion. Lack of Chromium in the diet of certain groups of people makes it difficult to process carbohydrates. Consuming excessive refined carbohydrates elevates triglycerides and as a person becomes over weight there is a greater risk of type 2 diabetes. Excessive fluoride consumption retards the thyroid gland which lowers metabolism. And on and on. I have not got the diffinative answer why midwives are no longer viable in bringing new life into the world. Is it one of the facets of society that becomes suppressed with corporations taking over every facet of service under the sun?

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

Loren Miller replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
23 minutes ago
Michael Penn commented on nikki summers's blog post atheist billboard
38 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
43 minutes ago
John Jubinsky posted photos
51 minutes ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is god good?
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
5 hours ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
5 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
5 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
5 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
5 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
5 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service