CREATIONISTS: WORLDS BIGGEST PERPETUAL LOSERS!

Creationism: Institute for Creation Research (ICR):=> FRAUDS!
Answers in Genesis :=> FRAUDS!
Creation Research Foundation:=>FRAUDS!

COMMITMENT: To demonstrate the bible is absolute truth and a creator exists citing scientific evidence:=> FRAUDULENT!

INTENT: To disprove evolution and somehow consider this as proving a creator exists (which it really doesn't achieve):=> FRAUDULENT!

APPROACH or TECHNIQUE: Posing arguments to confound laypeople and make evolution appear false:=> FRAUDULENT!

What is funny, is that even if they do defeat evolution (as it currently stands) they still haven't demonstrated a creator exists, scientists will just move on to developing another theory, that solves any problems found in evolution.
Scientists are quite happy for theories to be defeated, this means a challenge for them to come up with a better theory. Great scientists love challenges!

What is even funnier: Creationist material would still not be accepted by science, because of their FRAUDULENT BASIS STATED ABOVE!

Yes, science would have a challenge (happy scientists) and Creationists would still LOSE (Miserable Creationists)!
ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! :-D-
Thus I look forward to seeing evolution defeated as a theory, it would be fun watching those Creationists whimpering in their handkerchiefs as they suddenly find themselves having to find more fraudulent techniques to defeat an even stronger theory, which still won't give them credence for their fraudulent cause.

Just providing more material for my favorite stand-up comedians. 
Creationism loses even if it wins, forever!
They are definitely the worlds biggest PERPETUAL LOSERS!

Aye M8z! :-D&

Views: 105

Tags: Answers-in-Genesis, Creation, Ham, ICR, Institute, Ken, Research, answers, creationism, creationists, More…evolution, fraud, genesis, science

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by GOD'aye on March 3, 2013 at 6:21pm

My most recent reply to my Creationist m8, Solomon regarding perceived facts (Genesis) and Theories like Evolution: <Yes: Solomon:
When Ptolemy commissioned and produced the Septuagint, the knowledge of Genesis was set in concrete, never to be updated and thus considered as factual by believers.
The trouble with perceived factual statements, any alterations in knowledge that detract from the facts in Genesis, destroy Genesis completely.
Genesis was formulated and set in concrete around 250B.C.
It was disproven by Copernicus in the 15th century CE and has been, then Galilleo and has been destroyed since then.

The beauty of Theories as opposed to perceived facts set in concrete is that Theories are dynamic and gather information like snow rolling down a hill.
Evolution started off with observations of a few finch beaks, now it has snowballed into a massive science with several branches.
This snowball effect of theories is a wonderous part of how science works.
Everytime we try to disprove a theory and the disproof fails, but instead, confirms a theory, that information we tried to use to disprove the theory, now becomes part of the theory.
The discovery of DNA, made many scientists believe that we could use it to defeat Evolution, they failed and found that it actually confirmed evolution.
Thus Evolution suddenly gained a new branch called Genetic Evolution.
The snowball never ceases until Evolution gets disproven.
Likely all that missing evidence you so fondly cite, will only make the Evolution snowball bigger.
Aye M8ey! :-D-&>

Any advice??

Comment by GOD'aye on March 3, 2013 at 5:37pm

I noted a few spelling bloopers, but that site has scripts running that freeze up browsers and loses text.  So spelling mistakes are common when posting there, as the website is very badly engineered.

Comment by GOD'aye on March 3, 2013 at 5:33pm

Here's  one of my replies to Solomon (Creationist) on debate.org when he stated that I didn't understand the bible, which I studied intently for a few years.

<I understand the bible perfectly,'
It was not written for Theologians to interpret.
It was written for average laypeople (common people) to understand at the time.
This modern era brought in people bent of re-interpreting the dumb, naive scriptures to pretend that the writers were smarter than they were and that the bible holds relevant truths for today, which it doesn't.
These people are the Theologians or Christian Apologetics team. These people are all trained liars.

The bible was written for common people of 3000 years ago.
The knowledge it contains was out-dated 2000 years ago and hasn't been updated or corrected since.
Scientific knowledge is being corrected daily.
You knowledge (Creationism) became irrelevant 2000 years ago and hasn't had any useful knowledge added since then.
Evolution is being updated on a daily basis.
Your knowledge will never get updated, it is stagnant, ancient and completely useless to science.

Aye M8! :-D->

Comment by GOD'aye on March 2, 2013 at 6:40am

Here's a reply of mine to a rather naive Creationist, Solomon. it demonstrates the level of education and knowledge of these clowns.  No wonder they don't understand our rebuttals.

"

Posted by Sagey 1 day ago
Sagey

BTW:
Here's a great example why we know Solomon is way out of his depth of knowledge:

This idiotic rant of his "Oh, and viruses are actually having something called Epigenetic Adaptation, which mean no changes in genetics occur. It's like a weightlifter getting bigger muscles from lifting. They are getting stronger. Plus, viruses aren't quite organisms. If they don't become resistant to an antibiotic ( usually in the case of a very powerful antibiotic is added and kills the majority of the viruses), it is seen that they steal DNA from the cells they attach themselves to to become resistant. Evolutionist theorize that they evolved, but it has never been seen."

No Solomon, ABSOLUTELY WRONG!

WHY?

We don't use antibiotics to fight viruses.
Antibiotics are only used to fight bacteria.

DUMBO!

Even my ten year old niece knows that!"

Aye M8z!

Comment by GOD'aye on February 28, 2013 at 7:23pm

Here is a reply I gave to a fellow atheist on debate.org where the subject is "Evolution, Does It Make Sense"

I attack a reasonably naive (actually extremely dumb) creationist who calls himself Solomon, who will not read the references we give him properly and keeps coming back with standard Creationist attacks that indicate he doesn't understand our references.

This was my sort of attacking reply: "True 16K, germs have evolved the ability to communicate, gather together like militant Jihadists and signal mass attacks.
We may not be able to hear them speak, but hopefully scientists will be able to learn to decipher their chemical morse code and upset their communications to thwart their attacks.

The mutation that allows them to communicate has given them an incredible advantage over antibiotics. Antibiotics no longer work against such abilities as to organize themselves and behave intelligently. It requires a whole new approach to fighting bacteria by humans.
Bacteria are evolving intelligence, it won't be long before they can compete with Solomon in these debates!

Aye M8 :-D-"

I think it was sort of appropriate!  

Do you have anything to criticize or add!

 

Comment by GOD'aye on February 27, 2013 at 8:49pm

BTW Cay, maybe you could pose a little bit of fun and plant something that looks like a fossil in the regions you know they like to dig. animal bone (from a steak or something) or even a bit of driftwood with claw marks on it, sea shells, LOL, lots of ideas there.
Have fun with them while they are around.

You may not have them to toy with for long.
Especially if the NCSE pulls it's finger out from between it's buttocks.

Comment by GOD'aye on February 27, 2013 at 8:33pm

People often say I can be extremely insensitive.

Well, I'm extremely insensitive only to people I consider too stupid to be considered human.

Such are Creationists!

Comment by GOD'aye on February 27, 2013 at 8:26pm

Though I don't have any creationist friends any more, got rid of the last one a couple of years ago.
As far as I know, there is only a couple in the whole city and everybody thinks they are the city's biggest idiots. They used to try and sell their religion on street corners, but too many people started picking on and abusing them, so we don't see them any more.
Stirring them up used to be fun.
They were trying to suck in children with a self made Jesus cartoon booklet (not even funny) and lollipops. I snuck past, grabbed one and scribbled all sort of smut and funny comments into it and returned it to the pile while they concentrated on conning another child.
One child picked the filthy smutty comic up and burst into spontaneous laughter, probably at the big hairy testicles on Jesus on the cross where he peed on the guard.
They instantly snatched it from the lad, gathered around, shielding it from view with sinister ugly looks viewed the hilarious filth I added. They then gathered all their comics and sifted through them for any more edited copies, looked around to see if they could spot the offender, LOL and closed their little stall. It was funny, my mates all had a chuckle as they knew what I had written. Miss those loons, they were a gr8 source of amusement.

Comment by GOD'aye on February 27, 2013 at 8:16pm

Well Cay, I guess you have enjoyed: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/why-do-people-laugh-at-creationists/...

Though there's heaps more around to annoy any of your creationist friends who just happen to drop in unexpectedly: Oh, hope you don't mind, but we are watching some amusing videos, care to watch them with us? ROFL!

I've done that many times, don't care if they never visit again, it's often worth doing it for a laugh at the expression on their faces.
LOL!

Comment by GOD'aye on February 27, 2013 at 8:11pm

Tennessee is stuck between a rock and Creationist loony hard-place. FROM NCSE: "Gary Nixon, executive director of the Tennessee State Board of Education, was sanguine, saying, "We have some very solid science standards to be taught, and we expect those to be taught." But the Tennessean noted that the state's science standards received a grade of D in the Fordham Foundation's latest evaluation of state science standards, with the life science section faring poorest. Tennessee is committed, however, to adopting the Next Generation Science Standards, due later in the year, in which evolution is emphasized as one of the "disciplinary core ideas" of the life sciences.

Yes, the education standards are lacking there (suck actually), but the state has committed itself to following the national guidelines which include Evolution. There's already tension and we may very see another 'Monkey Trial' there.

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service