 |
The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
Chapter 1 of 'The Lie' by Ken Ham
Being tolerant of anything means that you are intolerant of anything Christian. Christians no longer have the right to impose their views on society. To say that people shouldn't be dogmatic is actually dogmatic. Christian absolutes are no longer acceptable as absolutes, therefore Christianity will eventually be outlawed.
It seems most scientists are biased, and most don't wear white lab coats. There are basically two types of scientists - those with penises and those without penises. Whether or not they have penises, they all study in the present. Creationists aren't restricted to the present because they have a book. Everybody is biased, but because they have a book, creationist biased is better than every other bias. Usual crap that science is a religion.
Not exactly deep and meaningful, more like shallow and turgid. As far as I am aware, Ken failed to win any prizes for this work, not even in the fiction category (where this book surely belongs).
I've read chapter 2, but can't be bothered to write anything down yet. As far as I remember, it's back to the science is a religion cobblers. Bet ya can't wait for the next instalment.
It seems most scientists are biased, and most don't wear white lab coats. There are basically two types of scientists - those with penises and those without penises. Whether or not they have penises, they all study in the present. Creationists aren't restricted to the present because they have a book. Everybody is biased, but because they have a book, creationist biased is better than every other bias. Usual crap that science is a religion.
Not exactly deep and meaningful, more like shallow and turgid. As far as I am aware, Ken failed to win any prizes for this work, not even in the fiction category (where this book surely belongs).
I've read chapter 2, but can't be bothered to write anything down yet. As far as I remember, it's back to the science is a religion cobblers. Bet ya can't wait for the next instalment.
Comment
-
Comment by Todd Skaggs on March 16, 2013 at 6:22pm -
David, I look forward to the next chapter review. I would much rather hear your opinion than have to slog through Ken's work in its entirety on my own. That would mean (shudder) paying for the book. To me his ideas are fascinating and repugnant at the same time. I'm amazed and saddened that anyone takes him seriously. Write on...
-
Comment by Dave Godfrey on March 16, 2013 at 8:40am -
Sorry Todd. I meant for Ken's stupidity to speak for itself. My summary of the next chapter I intend to be more in-depth.
-
Comment by Todd Skaggs on March 16, 2013 at 12:51am
-
Uh, I'm confused by this critique. I guess you are trying to say it was more nonsense from the evangelical king of stupidity? now I get it! Science is a religion (like "off" is a TV channel!) Makes about as much sense as "The Secret".
CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
J. Morr replied to Patrick F's discussion Fundraiser for Atheist in OK has already surpassed it's goal.
Ruth Anthony-Gardner commented on Dr. Terence Meaden's group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Brutal 4 Minutes for All of Religion Christopher Hitchens in the group Hang With Friends
 |
 |
 |
 |
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!
Join Atheist Nexus