How do Atheists know "right" from "wrong"?

Here's a question that arose on Yahoo! Answers, and my response

Atheists-How do you know what is right and wrong?

You can't really say "my conscience" because that would suppose something bigger than ourselves telling us what to and not to do and that would reveal another chink in the armor for evolution. Also, since you don't realize that God exists, where do these morals come from?


And here is how I responded:

While I disagree with the idea of Right and Wrong, I will respond to this from the standpoint of differentiating between helpful and harmful.

Human beings understand that there are actions that will be helpful or harmful. It's obvious that we don't want ourselves or our loved ones hurt, and we can extrapolate that this is true for others as well. Therefore, the idea of avoiding actions that can harm others is a commonly held, rational tenet.

Doing what is helpful is a bit trickier, because the ramifications of help can lead to dependence, which is often harmful, or self-righteousness, which is also often harmful. Being helpful requires either a negotiation and mutual agreement regarding the help or a determination that the person cannot negotiate and we are to be helpful without their assent.

Determining that God is the arbiter of right and wrong can actually lead to greater harm. For example, there is little doubt that Gay marriage would be helpful in society: It would lead to more stable relationships, would promote quality health care because of increased insurance coverage, would avoid costly legal maneuvers needed to secure couples' medical and inheritance rights, and would ease anxiety within the couple regarding their legal safety. However, because of citations in the Bible (said to be from God) that homosexuality cannot be condoned, many Christians are preventing this helpful course with nothing to support their objections beyond the statements in the Bible.

This is one example of theistic ethics leading to greater harm. There are countless others that come from all variety of religions, including slavery, subjugation of women, child abuse, murder of witches and other outside-the-faith groups, feudalism, and business restrictions, to name only a few. Each of these harms is (or was) held in place by believers in God's law; ethics gleaned from the rational rule of "do no harm" will prevent these injuries to human life, health & dignity.

Views: 15

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by NH Baritone on August 4, 2008 at 8:07pm
Thanks, Don, for the accurate proof-read. I'll change it!
Comment by NH Baritone on August 3, 2008 at 7:40pm
All of us is always stronger than any one of us. That's why humans were able to hunt, kill, and eat mastodons.
And oddly enough, that same cooperation meant taking care not to undermine one another individually.
Comment by Torontonian on August 3, 2008 at 7:33pm
Per Kropotkin, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" is a concept with an evolutionary justification. Cooperation between members of a species trumps all other strengths.

You don't need an explanation any more complex than this to explain morality.

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service