Why does someone have to be Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?

Just an open question. I am neither pro-life or pro-choice. I have an opinion, but I cannot label myself as either.

Views: 5

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by John Jubinsky on April 13, 2010 at 6:23am
The question may be rephrased as: Why does someone have to be a humanist or not be a humanist?
Comment by Louis on July 11, 2009 at 12:59am
I know what you mean.

As far as I'm concerned the way that the Supreme Court laid out the case in Roe v. Wade is satisfactory. I can't imagine their rationale being any more succinct, informed, and accommodating than that case.

Casey v Planned Parenthood I have some serious issues with, but I'm of the opinion that Roe v Wade, as it is written, is equally fair to all concerns.
Comment by Justin Pearson Smith on July 11, 2009 at 12:33am
I'm both pro life and pro choice except when it comes to fundamentalists then I'm pro-death j/k
Comment by Steve Spero on July 10, 2009 at 7:05pm
I see your point, but I come from a different point of view. I was a clinic escort for over eight years in the upper south. I saw the way that the supposedly religious protesters treated the patients coming in for a legal medical procedure. To say the least, it wasn't pretty.
I now live in San Diego, and it isn't that much of an issue here.
Comment by It's just Matt on July 10, 2009 at 12:09pm
Good books on the subject are: " This Common Secret" by Susan Wicklund and "The Girls Who Went Away" by Ann Fessler.

I concur with Catana, pro-choice IS pro-life.

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

Brent Feeney replied to James M. Martin's discussion It Doesn't Take Long for this Racist Missouri Lawman to Blast Anyone Different from a Middle-Aged White Male
1 minute ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
15 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan joined Sentient Biped's group
16 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
16 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Getting Speech Straight - "Homosexual" is not an LGBT-friendly term in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
18 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
21 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan posted a discussion
24 minutes ago
Idaho Spud liked Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs
26 minutes ago
Pat replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
28 minutes ago
Luara replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Getting Speech Straight - "Homosexual" is not an LGBT-friendly term in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
28 minutes ago
Grinning Cat added a discussion to the group Justice For All
29 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
39 minutes ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service