The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!

JOURNAL OF CREATION: Peer Reviewed, ROFL, What Peers?

BTW: I've been reviewing the Creationist's so called scientific journal, entitled: "Journal of Creation".

This is supposed to have PEER REVIEW!

ROFL! Those reviewing these papers are not peers in any scientific sense.

Dr Andrew Snelling (mere geologist) who started the Journal of Creation, himself is nowhere near being a peer, not even in his own field. Yet he reviews and publishes articles on Biology, Paleontology, Astronomy, etc....

The Journal of Creation has no peers that count as peers in any field. Thus their journal is as scientifically relevant us as a load of bats droppings, oops, terribly sorry bats, your droppings are far more relevant and interesting to science.

Aye M8z! :-D-

2 members like this

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by GOD'aye on March 14, 2013 at 6:37am: Yes Steph, Creationists are inviting scientists to peer review the articles, but, the peer review scientists are mostly not even scientists, they all have to accept any documents purporting their creationist viewpoint, that is the only criteria.

I've looked at the reviewers and for a Genetics paper, the reviewers are doctors, psychologists and even a lawyer, all pretending to be The Creation anti-Geneticist's Peers.

You are correct: It's just a SCAM to make common citizens believe they are reading real science.

Comment by Steph S. on March 6, 2013 at 10:07am: What ? A Journal of Creation - how very dogmatic and not scientific at all. What a scam.

Comment by GOD'aye on March 4, 2013 at 8:02pm: Here's a reply to a Creationist who calls himself "Maryland_Kid" that complains about and claims that all attacks on Christian Creationists are 'ad hominem'.

LOL

My Reply:

Posted by Sagey 1 second ago

Wrong Maryland Old M8! :-D-
The attack on Creationists (they are not really Christians, because most Christian groups hate them too) does not start out as ad hominem, the attacks are because of the sheer stupidity of their anti-scientific garbage.
But, their egos are so massive and their intelligence so small that they fight back with even worse stupid garbage, non-evidence and mis-perceptions.
Then it becomes ad hominem.

The ad hominem attacks are the Creationists own fault, they earn it by being absolutely and continually stupid in their anti-scientific, irrational attacks on reality.

That's why we think they are extremely funny here: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com...
Note: The video clips are taken from Creationist's own productions, not invented by anti-Creationists.
Yes, the stupidity depicted in these documentaries is all Creationists own idiotic propaganda, thus they earn the title of the most stupid group on planet Earth at the moment.

Comment by Joan Denoo on March 3, 2013 at 2:16pm: GOD'aye, you are absolutely correct about dropping having dangerous bugs. I misspoke.

Comment by The Mile High Sanity Project on March 3, 2013 at 6:57am: The journal of self-congratulatory mental ejaculate

Comment by Tom Reeves on March 2, 2013 at 8:34pm: @ John Aultman,

Thanks for posting the Nova link - watching now!

Comment by Joan Denoo on March 2, 2013 at 6:20pm: You know how big banks attempt to take over smaller banks; what happens when credit unions fail, what are our options? When public schools fail to teach the basics to our young people, private schools open with public funds and forcing private school to have to increase class size and reduce services; will private schools take over public schools? You know how difficult it is to keep libraries open in all city sizes; is it possible private libraries will be the only places we can get good reading material; will private church run libraries withhold everything except those books that dumb us down by teaching Bronze Age values with Stone Age beliefs? Oh! this is becoming a nightmare from hell. Anyone who speaks up gets the label "socialist"!

Comment by SteveInCO on March 2, 2013 at 5:36pm: You misread it. It's peeers with three Es. A pee-er is one who pees on science.

Comment by GOD'aye on March 2, 2013 at 5:26pm: Yes John, If they started removing scientist's qualifications from public record, in that they can keep their papers on their walls, but those papers will no longer be publicly recognized. Then Lehigh University would not be able to keep Michael Behe in employment, because he will no longer be recognized as qualified and thus not fit the position's criteria. They can simply kick the bugger out!

Comment by GOD'aye on March 2, 2013 at 5:22pm: BTW: A Creationist book mobile just passed by my place, LOL, is this an omen. Frankly I'm not superstitious, because it is superstition that drives those loons.

We still have the Australian branch of Creation Ministries trying to market their books. The must still be making sales to employ that decrepit old fossil driving their van.