BTW: I've been reviewing the Creationist's so called scientific journal, entitled: "Journal of Creation".
This is supposed to have PEER REVIEW!
ROFL! Those reviewing these papers are not peers in any scientific sense.
Dr Andrew Snelling (mere geologist) who started the Journal of Creation, himself is nowhere near being a peer, not even in his own field. Yet he reviews and publishes articles on Biology, Paleontology, Astronomy, etc....
The Journal of Creation has no peers that count as peers in any field. Thus their journal is as scientifically relevant us as a load of bats droppings, oops, terribly sorry bats, your droppings are far more relevant and interesting to science.
Aye M8z! :-D-