Issue 48 of Cosmos, December 2012 by Robin McKie
Earth formed about 4.6 billion years ago and life first appeared here about a billion years later. Scientists don’t agree over the processes involved but, according to some theories, extremophiles were involved.
Charles Darwin suggested life began in "a warm little pond". Earth's early atmosphere would have been rich in methane, ammonia, and other gases on which lightning and radiation might have acted to create complex organics including amino acids. These would have rained down into pools on the surface. As concentrations grew, proteins and nucleic acids would have formed, eventually producing the first life-forms.
In deep-sea vents?
Some scientists believe life began near deep-sea hydrothermal vents. The energy liberated there would have fuelled the chemical reactions needed to construct complex proteins. This idea finds support in DNA sequences of modern organisms, which suggest the most recent common ancestor of all life was probably an aquatic micro-organism that lived in extremely high temperatures – a thermophile.
On Mars?
Life requires water but too much can be harmful. Some scientists think that drier Mars would have been the best bet as a birthplace for life. Meteorite impacts would have blasted Martian rocks into space and all the way to Earth, carrying life with them. The hardy ones would have colonised Earth. In short, we might all be Martians.
On unknown planetary systems?
Panspermia, the idea that life comes from space, was developed by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius who argued that bacterial spores from another planetary system, propelled through space by light pressure, seeded life here. British astronomers Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe later argued that comets could carry bacterial life across space and protect it from radiation damage en route.
A gift from aliens?
Scientists such as Francis Crick and the late Carl Sagan have suggested microbes might have been sent to Earth by an advanced civilization was facing catastrophic annihilation or hoping to adapt planets for later colonization. This concept is known as directed panspermia, and we are the end product.
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/features/print/6377/life-where-did-it...
Comment
Comment by amer chohan on February 5, 2013 at 12:01pm I like that Future, chosing not to go too far in the past is a good approach. Mankind had invented horrors like religion by habbit of looking too far back in the history of the universe.
Comment by Sidney M. Gonzalez on February 5, 2013 at 11:38am "In trying to explain how life came to exist, people have been fixated on a problem of chemistry, that bringing life into being is like baking a cake that we have a set of ingredients and instructions to follow. That approach is failing to capture the essence of what life is about."
~ Paul Davies ~
Comment by Mark heartwell on January 31, 2013 at 4:40pm Mine started when mom and dad decided to have an extra glass of wine with dinner. Next thing you know, I was swimming my little tail off in the most important race of my life, emerging victorious over millions of other contestants.
Tom Sarbeck replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Christianity with and without reductio ad ridiculum fallacy in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
G posted a status
Joan Denoo replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Christianity with and without reductio ad ridiculum fallacy in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.


You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!
Join Atheist Nexus