Yes, Matt Dillahunty wipes his feet on Matt Slick.
Slick is not so slick, producing a fallacy a minute in this debate with Dillahunty.
Demonstrating clearly that even the best apologists are nothing but fallacious, moronic nutjobs.
I've been a fan of Steve Shives's work into reading and interpreting Christian Apologetics in a rationalist manner.
Steve is a very rational person and he pretty much destroys most of Christian Apologetics.
Here is Steve's appraisal of "I Don't Have Enough Faith To Be an Atheist" by Norman L. Geisler and Frank Turek. He exposes the writer's biases, bigotry and naivety.…Continue
I particularly like this review of the Movie:
"I’ve never been more insulted watching a film before. The universe created by Rich and David Christiano contains Christian characters who are so vapid and unaware, so unintelligent and clueless that they could have been created by atheists trying to spoof the intelligence of Christians. Likewise, the atheists in the film are so clueless as to their own ability to properly explain…Continue
It's been a while since I reviewed religious apologetics.
So I have been searching for anything new on the Theistic landscape.
So far, I've found absolutely nothing new in their arguments for God and for defense of their Faith in God.
I've been also viewing all the latest debates between Theists and others.
Again the Theist debaters, both Islamic and Christian offer nothing new.
The most intelligent Apologists appear to be those on the Islamic front…Continue
Catholics and some Protestant Christian groups still quote and stand by the writings of these two , who were once considered wise men, but forget that in worldly knowledge and rationality, they can be beaten now by the average intelligent ten year old, in both knowledge and wisdom.
For Thomas Aquinas:Continue