Nathan Phillips
  • Male
  • Decker, MI
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share Twitter

Nathan Phillips's Friends

  • Paul Lin
  • Scarletizm
  • Hiram
  • Gold Guy

Nathan Phillips's Discussions

Worthy of Praise

Started Jun 27, 2010 0 Replies

MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS

Started this discussion. Last reply by Gold Guy Aug 10, 2009. 6 Replies

Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?

Started this discussion. Last reply by Fred Werther Jun 30, 2010. 103 Replies

Gifts Received

Gift

Nathan Phillips has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Nathan Phillips's Page

Latest Activity

Nathan Phillips commented on eliza's group Steel City Skeptics
"Hey, I just moved to Donora near Pittsburgh.  I don't drink, but I'm interested in seeing what's available socially for the skeptically minded.  Thanks. "
Dec 10, 2011
Nathan Phillips replied to ɟǝןıx dǝʇɹɐɹ's discussion Who Should Decide Who Is Jewish? in the group Jewish Atheists
"Perhaps there can be a new scholarly field dedicated to what it is to be Jewish, that way it wouldn't be simply a matter of religious nor secular authority telling people about it.  I'd call it Judiology."
Dec 10, 2011
Vsevolod Igorevitch Kiriouchine replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"The word temple is far superior to the word church. It also obviously refers to a building, which dismisses a doubt many theists have, for example: "if atheists have a church doesn't that mean they believe in god, also where did i put my…"
Jun 30, 2010
Nathan Phillips replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"In the U.S. humanism isn't really a political association. However, I will note that there are humanists who reject much of modern atheism due to the elevation of the status of the human over all other life and an exaggerated notion of human…"
Jun 30, 2010
BLK-Sagan replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"Quite the writer! Very interesting, I will have to research Epicureanism."
Jun 30, 2010
Hiram replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"There already is one: Unitarian Universalist Church is officially agnostic and it's atheist friendly. It proposes that people should define their own spirituality and that questions matter more than answers. It requires no doctrinal assertion…"
Jun 29, 2010
El Solo Lobo replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"Who says "a church" can be nothing other than a religious institution?"
Jun 29, 2010
BLK-Sagan replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"I agree completely. Being that a Church is a religious institution, and we non-theist are not studying or praising a deity, I see no reason to use theist ideas for labeling. We are way smarter then that. I prefer " House of Logic " LOL"
Jun 29, 2010
Susan Manor replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"even better"
Jun 29, 2010
Susan Manor replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"oh I like that one!!"
Jun 29, 2010
Nathan Phillips replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"Yeah, I like refuge, but much more than religion, the word temple inspires awe. A temple is a grand structure with a grand purpose. There is no reason for people to think that without religion, there is no awe or awesomeness in our lives."
Jun 28, 2010
Nathan Phillips replied to Фелч Гроган's discussion What Did You Say About Muhammad?! [or why the west are a bunch of weenies]
"Having previously been in the brainwashed camp, I can tell you that one would have no idea that one was even wrong about a topic having never read anything from the opponent's camp. It's easy to get into an emotional groove and ride it…"
Jun 28, 2010
Nathan Phillips replied to Фелч Гроган's discussion What Did You Say About Muhammad?! [or why the west are a bunch of weenies]
"The soviet communists wouldn't accept modern genetic knowledge nor the consequences of evolutionary theory. The science didn't jive with their political notions of one-size-fits-all work, pay and government. Modern hippies or New Age…"
Jun 28, 2010
Nathan Phillips replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"I agree. The terms, forum, agora, institute, and academy sound good to me, but as you say someone will accuse us of being a religion. However, by avoiding all appearance of religion and even a name for ourselves, we invite others to say that we are…"
Jun 27, 2010
Raizinette replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"I agree with Mihai. To me "church" or "temple" is sort of synonymous to religion or religious beliefs."
Jun 27, 2010
Bradley Keene replied to Nathan Phillips's discussion Atheist Church? Why Not Atheist Temple?
"I like the idea of using terms like "agora" and "forum", as they definitely separate Atheism from from Theism. Here's the problem I have with the whole idea: No matter what name you put on it, Theists will see them as…"
Jun 27, 2010

Comment Wall (13 comments)

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

At 6:30pm on May 16, 2011, Ruth Anthony-Gardner said…
Greetings, Nathan! I notice you haven't been active at Atheist Nexus in a year. <sigh> Sometimes it can seem a bit fragmented, with different groups for every interest. Please consider a group for socializing, where we talk about whatever's on our minds, Hang With Friends. :D You might feel more at home.
At 7:05am on June 17, 2010, John Jubinsky said…
Hi Nathan! Have a very happy birthday.
At 12:00am on February 11, 2010, Scarletizm said…
Thanks. Actually I went to visit my dad never actually lived there. I also felt there was this type of white and black tension in that area as well. I'm too used to southern californias ]more] appreciation for diversity lol.
At 7:45am on January 28, 2010, Ralph Dumain said…
Thanks. I'm not familiar with "Atheist Nation". If by chance you are referring to "Atheist Nexus" chat, I wouldn't know, since I never do chat. And there are plenty of breakdowns as is without IM. It's plenty easy to get aggravated on Facebook.
At 8:51pm on January 26, 2010, Matthew F. said…
Nathan. I see no reason why you count not join the Jewish Atheist group. If you have an interest then you can Join.
At 1:21am on December 11, 2009, Libertino816 said…
No I have not seen Heavy Traffic ... It's on my to do list Wizards is one of my Fav movies...
At 3:06am on December 1, 2009, Ruthe said…
Hi Nathan...I found the Jatheist art on Israeli Atheists on facebook. Daniel gave permission to use freely. I do!...Ruthe
At 4:50am on November 15, 2009, Paul Lin said…
Hi,

Glad to meet a fellow atheist who is into 3d.
At 5:45pm on August 5, 2009, A Former Member said…
Hi Nathan, please consider joining my new group HERCULANEUM: A PLACE FOR MEN. Herculaneum is a group where men can discuss and explore the ideas, goals, demands, ethics, sexuality, and nature of manhood and masculinity. It is a place where we are free to be ourselves, and discuss the issues most important to our identities as men.

I have already started two discussions to get us going: How do we define manhood in the 21st century? and Rites of Passage: A Lost Ritual?.

This is a private group, and discussions can be viewed by members only. Membership is open to men only. Please check it out.
At 7:54pm on July 26, 2009, Gold Guy said…
There is a chat line. There are too many things here. Blogs, groups, chat, discussions. Too many choices. I'd rather it were more like Tribe, where groups (tribes) have energetic discussions. I don't like chat that much because I'd rather think and compose a post, rather than interact in real time. The real time chat tends to be shallow.
 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service