Elwood Herring
  • Male
  • Birmingham
  • United Kingdom
Share on Facebook
Share Twitter

Elwood Herring's Friends

  • matt
  • PZ Myers

Music

Loading…

Gifts Received

Gift

Elwood Herring has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Elwood Herring's Page





Comment Wall (1 comment)

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

At 3:00pm on August 9, 2008, Elwood Herring said…
Some thoughts on uncertainty by Elwood Herring

Quantum particles behave in ways that from our everyday experience seem utterly impossible. For instance, quantum particles have wave-like properties and can exist in many places at once. Why the objects we see around us every day—in what physicists call the "classical" world—don't behave this way despite being made of these very same strange quantum particles is a deep question in modern physics.

Most scientists have believed that the instant a quantum object was measured it would "collapse" from being in all the locations it could be, to just one location like a classical object. However, in 2006 Andrew Jordan, professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Rochester, together with Alexander Korotkov at the University of California, Riverside, spelled out how to exploit a quantum quirk to accomplish a feat long thought impossible, and this week a research team at the University of California at Santa Barbara has tested the theory, proving it correct.

Jordan proposed that it would be possible to weakly measure the particle continuously, partially collapsing the quantum state, and then "unmeasure" it, causing the particle to revert back to its original quantum form, before it collapsed.

(The above text copied from http://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=3220 )

So, as I see it, it's like this: you start off with four types of people, the first set contains people who reckon they understand Quantum Theory (QT), the second set don't, the third set only think they understand, and the final set are pretty sure they will never understand it.

Now all four of these types exhibit a certain amount of uncertainty, even (by necessity) the ones who think they are certain. So you must relabel these sets as 1) people who think they are certain they know, 2) people who believe they are certain they don't know, then 3) and 4) who are uncertain about knowing and not knowing, respectively.

The problems arise when some new data is discovered concerning QT, such as the article mentioned above. This has the effect of creating much more uncertainty across the board, realigning the boundaries between those who are certain they are certain, and those that are not, etc. In effect, this creates a certain amount of superposition of uncertainties about whether to accept the new data, and crucially, whether they can be certain about it. There will inevitably be some people who will reject this new information outright, but there will more likely be a greater proportion who will be uncertain about it, creating a feedback loop of ever greater uncertainty and therefore separating the previous superposition back to more or less the original state, by way of "uncollapse" as stated in the article. With me so far?

The upshot of all this is that the theory of QT will always be intrinsically uncertain, being by its very nature contrary to common sense. The more experiments are done, and the more facts are learned, the less certain anyone can be that it is inevitably understandable. So the only way to understand QT is actually to not do any research into it at all, and also to destroy all data so far collected into the entire phenomenon, then there can be no superposition of individuals in various states of uncertainty about it. In effect, the only way we can ever understand QT is to not understand it at all. That's the only way we can ever be absolutely certain.


... I think...
 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

William Sams replied to Dr. Terence Meaden's discussion Ecosystem found under Antarctic ice sheet raises hopes for alien life in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
6 minutes ago
William Sams replied to Steph S.'s discussion In what way are you still recovering from being brought up religious? in the group Recovering from Religion
8 minutes ago
Luara posted a photo
9 minutes ago
William Sams replied to Steph S.'s discussion In what way are you still recovering from being brought up religious? in the group Recovering from Religion
9 minutes ago
Luara commented on Joan Denoo's blog post There was a political will at work at the origins of the bible.
16 minutes ago
Amanda replied to Napoleon Bonaparte's discussion Viking Trance in the group Les Athées Napoléonienne
18 minutes ago
Sentient Biped replied to James M. Martin's discussion It Doesn't Take Long for this Racist Missouri Lawman to Blast Anyone Different from a Middle-Aged White Male
19 minutes ago
Idaho Spud replied to Luara's discussion A good antitract
22 minutes ago
Idaho Spud liked Luara's discussion A good antitract
23 minutes ago
Amanda posted a video

Viking Trance - Flight 129 from Napoleon Bonaparte on Vimeo.

Music by Viking Trance with video editing by Napoleon Bonaparte.
Another Smart Dog Videos (UK) production.
Viking Trance buy link;

Viking Trance - Flight 129

Music by Viking Trance with video editing by Napoleon Bonaparte. Another Smart Dog Videos (UK) production. Viking Trance buy link;
25 minutes ago
Luara commented on Gregory Phillip Dearth's blog post Infinity, Possibilities, the Multiverse, and Misconceptions
37 minutes ago
Sentient Biped commented on Joan Denoo's blog post There was a political will at work at the origins of the bible.
38 minutes ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service