AcesLucky
  • Male
  • Chandler, AZ
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share Twitter

AcesLucky's Friends

  • Rohan chetana
  • James Croft
  • TKnight
  • Joe Zamecki
  • animus
  • sacha
  • Howard S. Dunn
  • Wonderist
  • Evilgenius20
  • HotMess
  • John K

AcesLucky's Discussions

Paul Kurtz - "I refuse to be defined... as an Atheist"

Started this discussion. Last reply by Howard S. Dunn May 30, 2010. 49 Replies

Gifts Received

Gift

AcesLucky has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Truth Above Faith, because if it's not true...

Latest Activity

AcesLucky commented on John K's group Phoenix
"Still nobody in Phoenix, eh. Bummer."
May 15, 2011
Evilgenius20 liked AcesLucky's video
Mar 15, 2011
AcesLucky replied to Alli Armstrong's discussion Appologetic's Bible
"Hi Alli, May I make a suggestion? First, make sure you let your parents know that you love them no matter what they choose to believe (and isn't that true?). And truly, make it okay [ this is a statement about you, not about them ]. You can…"
Mar 7, 2011
AcesLucky commented on Mr. Apostate's video
Thumbnail

Jennie sends message in a vagina

"Hey Lsgl, what does the "A" stand for that you're using across from your comments?"
Sep 10, 2010
AcesLucky commented on Loren Miller's video
Thumbnail

Professor Richard Dawkins schools an ignorant fools delusion of atheist morality.

"5 stars - it won't let me rate it so I'll just say it!"
Jul 28, 2010
AcesLucky replied to Janet K's discussion Does anyone think it's possible...
"Christianity is constantly being disproved. That's why there are so many variations (over a thousand denominations) and it's why Christianity today is nothing like the beliefs of the past. Every time science makes a discovery that…"
Jun 25, 2010
Thomas Quidachay commented on AcesLucky's video
Thumbnail

Dan Barker kicks ass on Day of Prayer

"Damn we as Atheists are so smarter."
May 30, 2010
Thomas Quidachay commented on AcesLucky's video
Thumbnail

Dan Barker kicks ass on Day of Prayer

"Every day I take a S#!t. We should have a take a S#!t day!"
May 30, 2010
Howard S. Dunn replied to AcesLucky's discussion Paul Kurtz - "I refuse to be defined... as an Atheist"
"My friend Ken - a scientist - tries to make this same point. I fail to see it. Atheist doesn't carry that sense. It might be read that way - but that is not what it means. And it is truly splitting hairs to try and draw a line between someone…"
May 30, 2010
Abnormal replied to AcesLucky's discussion Paul Kurtz - "I refuse to be defined... as an Atheist"
"Same same."
May 29, 2010
Gila Guerilla replied to AcesLucky's discussion Paul Kurtz - "I refuse to be defined... as an Atheist"
"Sam in WV: Being an atheist does not begin to define what I am or my beliefs. That is all that I want to convey, when I call myself an atheist. I don't have any other labels for myself. If I did, they probably wouldn't have anything to do…"
May 29, 2010
Sam in WV replied to AcesLucky's discussion Paul Kurtz - "I refuse to be defined... as an Atheist"
"Being an atheist does not begin to define what I am or my beliefs. It only defines an attribute of what I am not . Since 9/11 however, the influence of theism and its well-financed cultures on public policy and social identity, it is a pretty…"
May 27, 2010
Abnormal replied to AcesLucky's discussion Paul Kurtz - "I refuse to be defined... as an Atheist"
"I agree with what he says. I don't really call myself an atheist and I feel the movement as a whole just isn't about atheists there's more parts to it than that."
May 27, 2010
demetrios babalis replied to AcesLucky's discussion Paul Kurtz - "I refuse to be defined... as an Atheist"
"@AcesLucky I do value people with passions. And with this said, when we speak of a "torchbearer of reason behind the inquiring mind", it is quite appropriate to share that many people are required to hold up this torch. Paul may be…"
May 27, 2010
AcesLucky replied to Tom Thompson's discussion Book: The Case for God - Karen Armstrong
"Much of the fundamentalism that we see today is a relatively recent phenomenon and is likely very much a response to the scientific progress and abandonment of age old ways of living life which modern rationalists promote. I see just the opposite.…"
May 24, 2010
AcesLucky replied to Noah Petersen's discussion Arizona Immigration Bill
"You don't have to explain. I do live here. I live in Chandler and have seen the place mushroom with Hispanics, including the loud mariachi on weekends down the damn street. I do not like it. My wife does not like it, and she's half…"
May 24, 2010
AcesLucky replied to Closet Nigerian Atheist's discussion Christians, Muslims and Fellow atheists, was Mary a whore?
"No, but she was pimped."
May 24, 2010
AcesLucky replied to JOEL FERNANDES's discussion Against drawing mohammad(for a reason)
"I understand your fears. You state: "By insulting their religious beliefs, we are adding to the troubles of atheists in religious societies." Unfortunately, this particular strain of religion is inherently violent towards atheists and…"
May 24, 2010
AcesLucky replied to Noah Petersen's discussion Arizona Immigration Bill
"The states have absolutely no right to regulate immigration. I don't think they're tying to regulate immigration, I think they're trying to control immigration into the state. (Notwithstanding that for the last 20 years we invited…"
May 23, 2010
AcesLucky replied to James Turkia's discussion Presuppositional apologetics: explanation requested.
"It is the presupposition in this argument that requires the argument. Otherwise why not just begin with "There is a god, therefore there's a god.""
May 23, 2010

AcesLucky's Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

AcesLucky's Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Comment Wall (13 comments)

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

At 10:29pm on May 12, 2011, Ruth Anthony-Gardner said…
Greetings, AcesLucky! I'd like to invite you to a group where we talk about anything on our minds, Hang With Friends. :D Funny picture.
At 2:50am on November 30, 2009, Wonderist said…
BTW, your comment sparked me to write a better description of What is wonderism? Thanks!
At 3:01pm on November 28, 2009, Wonderist said…
Hi AcesLucky, the most info about wonderism is in the discussions on the Wonderism group. I never really could consistently make videos, largely due to my ADHD and procrastination. But now I'm writing regularly for the group, so more info will continue to be posted there.

Wonderism is an attempt to articulate what I see as a common underlying set of ideas held by many of the best defenders of reason and science (best example being Carl Sagan). I personally adopted it as my own philosophy a few years ago, as opposed to just playing around with the ideas I was seeing in common.

I'm absolutely open to any doubts, skepticism or criticism, or just questions, comments, or other feedback. Please feel totally free to ask me anything on your mind about it. I would especially like to hear from those who have serious doubts or trepidation.

From checking out your site, you may be interested in the posts on pragmatism (about truth) and faith (about, well, faith). I totally agree with your sentiment about truth above faith. I think we likely hold similar evidence-based, rational philosophies. Wonderism is about bringing those ideas to a greater public audience, very much along the lines of what Carl Sagan was trying to do.
At 8:17am on September 10, 2009, James Croft said…
I may be misreading Elgin's piece, but I didn't read the las page as equating "tenable" with "invalid". Rather, I feel that we could say "it may have been tenable at one time, but no longer in light of competing theories which are more tenable". So there's a sort of bounded relativity to it. I will ask her about this question on Monday especially for you!
At 1:45pm on August 25, 2009, James Croft said…
Those are some tough questions!

You ask:

"1.) Is faith epistemologically valid? 2.) Is the universe deterministic? 3.) How do you measure - or even discuss-aesthetics (as form? function? grace? morality?), what?"

I'll see if I can say something about these questions in a short way. 1.) It depends on how you view the enterprise of epistemology. The philosophers I respect the most see epistemology as an attempt to define the process of gaining "understanding", rather than "knowledge" (as knowledge traditionally conceived is almost impossible to get, and our understanding of the world from science depends critically on obvious and egregious falsehoods). That opens the door for faith, because one's faith might well help you understand the world. But it doesn't open the door very far, because it also requires that we judge between different ways of understanding the world on the basis of certain criteria (which end up putting faith-based perspectives very low on the list). So it becomes a case of "faith based perspectives can be minimally epistemologically valid but generally nowhere near as valid as scientifically-based systems". This puts many atheists in an uncomfortable position, but it seems to me an arguable epistemic approach. Kate Elgin's paper "True Enough", in Philosophical Issues, 14, Epistemology, 2004, is great on this.

2.) I have no idea! But I think a more important question is the question of human free-will - how it seems to us, and whether it actually is how it seems. There's a lot of debate about this amongst philosophers, neuroscientists etc. but I honestly think the jury's out at the moment. Some think that ultimately we will discover we have no free will. Others think that there are types of materialistic explanation of human consciousness that would leave the door open for free will.

3.) How you discuss aesthetics? Well, there are as many answers to that question as there are aestheticians, but I like to look at it in terms of symbolic function - how are these objects / actions functioning as symbols, and how does that affect us? This allows us to consider not only traditional art, but all symbolic interactions as "aesthetic" - including the moral interactions you describe. I am much influenced by Nelson Goodman here (a teacher of Kate Elgin's).
At 9:17pm on August 20, 2009, HotMess said…
Welcome to "Are You Experienced?" We look forward to getting to know you!
At 12:01am on August 5, 2009, sacha said…
I'm pleased to make your acquaintance as well.

Cheers,
sacha
At 4:54pm on July 31, 2009, Niko Theris said…
AcesLucky,

Thanks for the compliment. I owe my condition to the good genes my mother and father gave me. True, I don't smoke. I quit when I was a little boy after my father caught me stealing his cigarettes. Fortunately, I've always eaten good and nutritious foods and in moderation. Thanks again.

Niko Theris, aka Naughty Niko
At 11:13pm on July 23, 2009, Evilgenius20 said…
Thanks, I'm glad you liked them.
At 11:35pm on July 6, 2009, Sentient Biped said…
Aces,
I enjoy reading your comments. I hope you'll continue posting your thoughts and make me think.

I'm also glad to see someone in my age range here. Not that I mind all of the younger ones - it gives me hope for the future. But sometimes I feel like Methusaleh.

Plus, now and then it's fun to talk to someone who didn't just learn about Vietnam in a history book, or who actually went outside and looked up to the sky when we landed on the moon. A little grey hair can be a good thing.

Best wishes,

Daniel
 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

MJ

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service