Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Nexus to add comments!

Join Atheist Nexus

Comment by Peter Cordel on July 11, 2013 at 9:25am

You are right, that is a lot of foreskins. Let me be Frank with you, you seem in an arguing mood, today, so I won't call you surely, again. (chortle)

Comment by Loren Miller on July 11, 2013 at 8:19am

Actually, I can, Peter ... and don't call me"surely!" [chuckle!]

Comment by Peter Cordel on July 11, 2013 at 7:23am

Loren, surely you cannot argue with 200 foreskins for a wife, seems only fair.

Comment by Loren Miller on July 11, 2013 at 6:50am

Not just an "utter jerk," but rather clearly a sadist as well, GC!

Comment by Peter Cordel on July 11, 2013 at 5:03am

No devil, for sure, but a god who's an "utter jerk," that is a god I can believe in, or none at all. (Still chuckling at your comment.)

Comment by Grinning Cat on July 11, 2013 at 1:23am

<grin!> Maybe there is a god who's an utter jerk.

But the evidence suggests the absence of any gods (as external beings, rather than people's beliefs or characters or stories) a lot more strongly.

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on July 10, 2013 at 11:31pm

LOL

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service