CREATIONISTS: WORLDS BIGGEST PERPETUAL LOSERS!

by GOD'aye

Feb 25

Creationism: Institute for Creation Research (ICR):=> FRAUDS!
Answers in Genesis :=> FRAUDS!
Creation Research Foundation:=>FRAUDS!

COMMITMENT: To demonstrate the bible is absolute truth and a creator exists citing scientific evidence:=> FRAUDULENT!

INTENT: To disprove evolution and somehow consider this as proving a creator exists (which it really doesn't achieve):=> FRAUDULENT!

APPROACH or TECHNIQUE: Posing arguments to confound laypeople and make evolution appear false:=> FRAUDULENT!

What is funny, is that even if they do defeat evolution (as it currently stands) they still haven't demonstrated a creator exists, scientists will just move on to developing another theory, that solves any problems found in evolution.
Scientists are quite happy for theories to be defeated, this means a challenge for them to come up with a better theory. Great scientists love challenges!

What is even funnier: Creationist material would still not be accepted by science, because of their FRAUDULENT BASIS STATED ABOVE!

Yes, science would have a challenge (happy scientists) and Creationists would still LOSE (Miserable Creationists)!
ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! :-D-
Thus I look forward to seeing evolution defeated as a theory, it would be fun watching those Creationists whimpering in their handkerchiefs as they suddenly find themselves having to find more fraudulent techniques to defeat an even stronger theory, which still won't give them credence for their fraudulent cause.

Just providing more material for my favorite stand-up comedians. 
Creationism loses even if it wins, forever!
They are definitely the worlds biggest PERPETUAL LOSERS!

Aye M8z! :-D&

Load Previous Comments

  • GOD'aye

    Here's  one of my replies to Solomon (Creationist) on debate.org when he stated that I didn't understand the bible, which I studied intently for a few years.

    <I understand the bible perfectly,'
    It was not written for Theologians to interpret.
    It was written for average laypeople (common people) to understand at the time.
    This modern era brought in people bent of re-interpreting the dumb, naive scriptures to pretend that the writers were smarter than they were and that the bible holds relevant truths for today, which it doesn't.
    These people are the Theologians or Christian Apologetics team. These people are all trained liars.

    The bible was written for common people of 3000 years ago.
    The knowledge it contains was out-dated 2000 years ago and hasn't been updated or corrected since.
    Scientific knowledge is being corrected daily.
    You knowledge (Creationism) became irrelevant 2000 years ago and hasn't had any useful knowledge added since then.
    Evolution is being updated on a daily basis.
    Your knowledge will never get updated, it is stagnant, ancient and completely useless to science.

    Aye M8! :-D->

    Mar 3

  • GOD'aye

    I noted a few spelling bloopers, but that site has scripts running that freeze up browsers and loses text.  So spelling mistakes are common when posting there, as the website is very badly engineered.

    Mar 3

  • GOD'aye

    My most recent reply to my Creationist m8, Solomon regarding perceived facts (Genesis) and Theories like Evolution: <Yes: Solomon:
    When Ptolemy commissioned and produced the Septuagint, the knowledge of Genesis was set in concrete, never to be updated and thus considered as factual by believers.
    The trouble with perceived factual statements, any alterations in knowledge that detract from the facts in Genesis, destroy Genesis completely.
    Genesis was formulated and set in concrete around 250B.C.
    It was disproven by Copernicus in the 15th century CE and has been, then Galilleo and has been destroyed since then.

    The beauty of Theories as opposed to perceived facts set in concrete is that Theories are dynamic and gather information like snow rolling down a hill.
    Evolution started off with observations of a few finch beaks, now it has snowballed into a massive science with several branches.
    This snowball effect of theories is a wonderous part of how science works.
    Everytime we try to disprove a theory and the disproof fails, but instead, confirms a theory, that information we tried to use to disprove the theory, now becomes part of the theory.
    The discovery of DNA, made many scientists believe that we could use it to defeat Evolution, they failed and found that it actually confirmed evolution.
    Thus Evolution suddenly gained a new branch called Genetic Evolution.
    The snowball never ceases until Evolution gets disproven.
    Likely all that missing evidence you so fondly cite, will only make the Evolution snowball bigger.
    Aye M8ey! :-D-&>

    Any advice??

    Mar 3