Politics, Economics, and Religion

Information

Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 97
Latest Activity: on Tuesday

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

Free market creates monopoly - no market, no freedom

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo on Tuesday. 5 Replies

Barry Lynn explains that a monopolist doesn't have to control 100% of a market. With the US having thousands of markets controlled as monopolies, we suffer the Economics of Destruction.What monopoly means is that a company has sufficient control of…Continue

Tags: free market economics, monopoly

Turns out that lawsuits have rules (Daily Kos)

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Joan Denoo Aug 6. 4 Replies

So ... now that John Boehner and the House of Representatives have decided that the most important thing on their agenda is suing President Obama for having the unmitigated nerve to want to accomplish something during his second term of office, it…Continue

Tags: rules, president, Barack Obama, sue, John Boehner

An Open Letter to Congressman John Boehner

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 26. 2 Replies

Some days ago, Congressman John Boehner (R - Ohio) wrote an op-ed piece entitled, "…Continue

Tags: president, Barack Obama, sue, John Boehner

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by Dyslexic's DOG on June 11, 2013 at 11:59pm

One problem found in multicultural societies is just that, separation from society by enclaves of same ethnicity, religious or cultural groups. These are often the breeding grounds of radicals and even terrorists.

Separation from society may be an individual option, but, when an entire group separates and define their own subculture, the main society can suffer. 

The ghettos are examples of these enclaves of subcultures and we know of the problems they face from history.

In Australia we have such enclaves and we are trying to disperse them so they blend better into the overall super-culture, reducing the risk of enclave based gang violence and cultural wars.

Finding people of common interest and beliefs is fine, so long as it doesn't become a divisive sub-culture. These small pictures need to blend unobtrusively into the bigger picture to produce a more variant but harmonious social fabric.

Britain is also having difficulties with the formation of Islamic enclaves and divisive right wing enclaves in the industrial regions.

Comment by Lord Ainsworth on June 11, 2013 at 11:05pm

Very true.

Comment by Joan Denoo on June 11, 2013 at 9:58pm

Yes, separating from society is one option. Another might be to find people with common interests and imagine a preferred outcome. Working toward a goal, especially if others share that goal, is how evolution occurs. 

Comment by Lord Ainsworth on June 11, 2013 at 9:52pm

I would say, purpose of life is to separate from society. 

Comment by Lord Ainsworth on June 11, 2013 at 9:45pm

Individualism isn't a problem of state.

Comment by Joan Denoo on June 11, 2013 at 9:08pm

There are two kinds of income, earned and unearned. Earned income is the labor it takes to make bread, build houses, and buildings, grow grains and beef and milk cows. The other is unearned income, the kind that money earns the income, not labor. Earned and unearned are taxed at different rates. After WWII, there was such a large need for labor, workers were able to demand high wages, especially for those who worked under union contracts. As the union busting began, labor started loosing ground. There was a sharp gap begin to develop in the late 1970s, and I watched it when I bought my first computer, put a statistical analysis program on it, and started keeping track. The gap was small in 1980, grew exponentially larger as the years past and we are now worse off then at the beginning of the Great Depression. The numbers prove my statement. 

Another thing that began to happen was sending jobs overseas to cheaper labor markets/slave markets. 

A third thing happened, unearned income began to be sent off-shore, thus escaping taxes altogether. 

A fourth thing was corporations being made a "person" thus gaining horrific power over our government. 

A fifth element was the working people mistook what is happening, blamed the poor for draining away money into social services, and blamed immigrants who were willing to work for less, not realizing that all these factors work against wage earners. The Tea Party reflects that misjudgment.

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 6, 2013 at 11:36am

Two Congressmen insist the U.S. Constitution doesn't guarantee the right to vote -- and they've introduced a proposed amendment to fix this.

Mark Pocan, a representative from Wisconsin, has joined with Keith Ellison from Minnesota to introduce a new constitutional amendment in the U.S. House of Representatives that guarantees everyone 18 years and older the right to vote in elections. [...]

Pocan said he was inspired to support the amendment after a voter ID law effort in Wisconsin was defeated because of a “right to vote” clause in that state’s constitution.

“Even though the right to vote is the most mentioned right in the Constitution, legislatures across the country have been trying to deny that right to millions of Americans, including in my home state of Minnesota. It’s time we made it clear once and for all: every citizen in the United States has a fundamental right to vote,” Ellison said when the bill was introduced.

PolitiFact analyzed their assertion that there is no explicit right to vote in the Constitution, and found it True.

Comment by Joan Denoo on May 28, 2013 at 12:36am

Medea Benjamin v. President Obama: CodePink Founder Disrupts Speech...

This woman has a voice that needs to be heard. 

"CodePink co-founder Medea Benjamin describes why she repeatedly interrupted Obama’s address. Benjamin, the author of "Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control," criticized Obama for failing to explain why a U.S. drone in Yemen killed the teenage U.S. citizen Abdulrahman al-Awlaki in 2011. "I was very disappointed. He said that his policy is to capture, not kill. That’s just not true. I know personally of many incidents where it would have been very easy to capture people, like the 16-year-old Tariq Aziz in Pakistan, who was in Islamabad at a well-known hotel, but instead was killed by a drone strike two days later," Benjamin says. "I think the president is really justifying the use of drones, which will continue to happen under his administration and be passed on to the next."

Comment by Joan Denoo on May 28, 2013 at 12:25am

Memorial Day Special: U.S. Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Return ...

It is my dream that mothers and fathers, wives and husbands, children and grandchildren stand with U.S. Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan as they return their war medals at NATO Summit. 
To willingly send our loved ones off to a war such as USA wages now does our loved ones no honor, nor does it honor those who come home wounded or dead. We are at a new epic change in human history. We can no longer send our people armed with explosives and poisons in order to resolve a conflict. We are capable of so much more. There are other ways to solve problems.  

Homo sapiens will either grow into our new capacities, or destroy all that is precious and good in our species. 

Comment by Joan Denoo on May 26, 2013 at 10:50am

NTSB: No clearance signage at Skagit River bridge

River-level view of the collapsed section of the I-5 bridge. May 25, 2013.

"when a truck carrying an oversize load hit the I-5 bridge over the Skagit River, the concrete surface of the bridge deck “slid off the girders, like frosting sliding off a cake.”

“The bending and buckling of the bridge is telling our investigators where the failure originated and how it propagated.”

~ National Transportation Safety Board, Officials 

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

k.h. ky replied to John Jubinsky's discussion Scientists Say Neanderthals and Modern Humans Coexisted in Europe for about 5,400Years in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
5 minutes ago
Joan Denoo liked John Jubinsky's discussion Scientists Say Neanderthals and Modern Humans Coexisted in Europe for about 5,400Years
17 minutes ago
Joan Denoo posted a blog post
21 minutes ago
Joseph P replied to John Jubinsky's discussion Scientists Say Neanderthals and Modern Humans Coexisted in Europe for about 5,400Years in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
44 minutes ago
Freethinker31 commented on Freethinker31's blog post About that Bible
1 hour ago
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Scot Hinson's discussion Suicide ?!?
1 hour ago
Sentient Biped replied to John Jubinsky's discussion Scientists Say Neanderthals and Modern Humans Coexisted in Europe for about 5,400Years in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
1 hour ago
k.h. ky replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Flying Spaghetti Monster invades heaven.
1 hour ago
k.h. ky replied to John Jubinsky's discussion Scientists Say Neanderthals and Modern Humans Coexisted in Europe for about 5,400Years in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
1 hour ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner commented on Little Name Atheist's group Atheist Ailurophiles
1 hour ago
Tara Toleman joined John Tidwell's group
1 hour ago
Sentient Biped commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
2 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service