Politics, Economics, and Religion

Information

Politics, Economics, and Religion

Religion has so many connections to political and economic beliefs, there needs to be a place to identify linkages, problems, goals, options, action plans and evaluation criteria.  

Members: 100
Latest Activity: 1 hour ago

What is the purpose of life?

An eternal question, what is the purpose of life?, occupied philosophers’ thoughts throughout history. Stone pictographs reveal even primitive peoples reflected on this query. Each one has the capacity to define his or her personal thinking about politics, economics and religion.

Discussion Forum

Religious fascism

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Alan Perlman on Saturday. 7 Replies

Continue

Tags: Saffron, Fascism", Christian, Hindu, fascism

Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative

Started by Grinning Cat. Last reply by Sky God Dec 31, 2014. 11 Replies

Worth a read! Greta Christina explains philosopher Rebecca Goldstein's observation on a fundamental difference between "liberal" and "conservative" core values, and why things aren't as simple as "agreeing to disagree" between two "equally valid"…Continue

Tags: purity, democracy, loyalty, authority, avoidance of harm

You Can't Educate People Into Believing in Evolution

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Loren Miller Dec 1, 2014. 4 Replies

"Hill found that religious belief was the strongest determinant of people's views on evolution—much more so than education, socioeconomic status, age, political views, or region of the country. More importantly, "Creationists are substantially more…Continue

Tags: confront, evolution, creationism, beliefs

Karen Armstrong is dangerous

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Sheeva Nov 25, 2014. 17 Replies

"Karen Armstrong is dangerous. She’s dangerous because her blanket of tedious verbiage hides the truth that she wants us to completely ignore the dangers of religious dogma.  It appears that for her, there is no harmful dogma that can be pinned on…Continue

Tags: oppression, nihilism, politics, religious dogma, Karen Armstrong

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Politics, Economics, and Religion to add comments!

Comment by tom sarbeck on August 14, 2014 at 12:38am

Were the monks in de Sade's Justine atypical?

Comment by James M. Martin on August 13, 2014 at 6:02pm

Well, Tom, we are not all cut out to be monks.

Comment by tom sarbeck on August 12, 2014 at 7:06pm

CC (newly devised texting talk for chuckle, chuckle. It's not yet in the Urban Dictionary).

When I dumped Catholicism I imagined myself facing a huge void and checked out several non-xian religions. As I recall one of Buddhism's requirements was that I have no attachments.

It was too much like Catholicism's self-denial. I was in my 20s and had a few things I wanted to do. They included doing what C'cism wanted me to quit doing: jerking off. Bye bye, Buddhism.

Comment by James M. Martin on August 12, 2014 at 6:54pm

You did, Joan Denoo, and the Yoga Aphorisms of Patanjali once inspired me. The kleshas make sense even if you do not believe in a deity (though of course a Hindu would find this unpardonable). Ignorant is what I call most politicians; egotists come in all colors and stripes; attachment plagues those in a capitalist society: we are attached to our food, our TV, &c. Aversion and clinging I always called the twin kleshas. Simply put, if you are attached to unhealthy foods, you better not count on clinging.

Comment by Joan Denoo on August 12, 2014 at 6:20pm

Kleshas? OK I'll go on a hunt: 

"Within these key principles we find the five kleshas, or obstacles to the means to liberation:

"ignorance, egoism, attachment, aversion and clinging to life."

~ Patanjali Revisited: A Run Down on the 5 Kleshas- by Bibi Lorenzetti 

@ James, did I fine the correct definition? 

Comment by James M. Martin on August 12, 2014 at 5:34pm

@Tom. I think so. I went through a phase in my occult years of devotion to the principles of the Hindu and Buddhist tantrics, although my version of sadhana was a lot more complicated. I loved the sayings of tantric sages. For example, and I have substituted my own substances for western simplicity: "There is no difference between a palm's worth of chocolate and a palm's worth of shit." (Maybe William S. Burroughs had this in mind when, in one of his routines, he had the wealthiest family in America -- say, the Waltons -- taking their new son into the family board room. Or maybe it's that hobby store. And the president, probably his grandfather, takes into the board room shitter and says, sit there until you dump, money's not worth the shit from your body.) I cannot imagine why any human needs a billion dollars unless it is to feed his kleshas.

Comment by tom sarbeck on August 11, 2014 at 10:33pm

James,

I like existentialism. Therefore, the people you identify and the drunks or mentally ill sleeping under bridges have equally meaningful life purposes.

Comment by James M. Martin on August 11, 2014 at 10:18pm
Comment by James M. Martin on August 11, 2014 at 10:12pm

The only purpose of life is to do something worthwhile in it even if it doesn't directly help people, as with inventing an ebola vaccination. Poets contribute as much as epidemiologists, as do artists, composers, &c. All art is magic. All of our origins are chance events. What free will there is will always be helped or hindered by that one aleatory operation.

Comment by tom sarbeck on August 11, 2014 at 9:13pm

What Joan says about parents and children in different socio-economic classes is so very true. The consequences for the less advantaged children are tragically true.

And so:

1) the political conservatives' bootstrap talk, and

2) the religious rewarding-the-deserving talk,

are both euphemisms for social Darwinism.

They are correct in that giving effect to either or both will improve the gene pool.

The means they choose for that end horrifies liberals and perhaps progressives.

Do the opposing parties sit down and talk about issues that are not easy to talk about, or do they continue to attack each other?

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

Nexus on Social Media:

Latest Activity

Joan Denoo replied to Donald L. Engel's discussion The Universal Love Triangle in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
5 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to Asa Watcher's discussion Dawkins' "love letters"
9 minutes ago
MagetheEntertainer posted a video

Moderately Religious

Moderately Religious In this video I discuss how being moderately religious is hypocritical and doesn't make any sense. If you like this video hit like and s...
9 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to Matt Gabe's discussion The afterlife should still matter to atheists
13 minutes ago
Steve replied to Jonas Stmichael's discussion The Ever Widening Gap Between Rich and Poor
14 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Donald L. Engel's discussion The Universal Love Triangle in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
17 minutes ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner commented on Steph S.'s group Geek & Nerd Haven
19 minutes ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner commented on Richard Knight's group Secular Sexuality
24 minutes ago

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service