Winning Arguments!

Information

Winning Arguments!

Practice your skills to win religious debates using information, persuasion, logic, and reason!

Members: 397
Latest Activity: Apr 19

Discussion Forum

Christian Jihad

Started by Ian Mason. Last reply by George Sep 23, 2011. 1 Reply

Arguments Against Atheism

Started by Michael. Last reply by Elric Sims Sep 15, 2011. 14 Replies

Conversational Atheist blog

Loading… Loading feed

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Winning Arguments! to add comments!

Comment by William on March 21, 2010 at 4:15am
Wait a second...
Somewhere the point of argumentation got lost its not about winning. Its about the art of sound, valid and creative argument. This art is lost on laymen theist. (who is usually the target, not the theologians)The laymen theist isn't arguing he talks hes attempting conversion. It may seem like an argument because emotions get boiled but its not. The atheist may very well being using the tool box of argumentation but the theist is not. Arguing needs two actors, who are fully aware there is an argument at hand.
Comment by Wonder Weirdo on March 14, 2010 at 3:45pm
I'm selling my guitar if anyones interested. I don't want to do this, but I have no choice. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280478794751
Comment by Aiden on February 19, 2010 at 1:44pm
Agreed. My first thoughts upon reading about Dunning-Kruger were about the Tea-Bagger movement...
Comment by Joe Running on February 19, 2010 at 6:43am
@Aiden
The Dunning-Kruger effect explains ALL of Sarah Palin's base. ;)
Comment by Aiden on February 18, 2010 at 1:18pm
The Dunning–Kruger effect:

A cognitive bias in which "people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it".
Comment by Aiden on February 18, 2010 at 12:30pm
Our Founders Were NOT Fundamentalists

This article over at HumanistNetworkNews.org goes over the answers to the common claims of the "religious right". A handy resource.
Comment by Sigmund on February 4, 2010 at 4:11pm
you might be interested in my (somewhat propagandistic - certainly not 'objective') 'atheist pamphlet' at atheistprinciples.tripod.com, written with the intention of giving it to any religious campaigners that try to convert me...
comments would be appreciated
Comment by Jason Spicer on January 29, 2010 at 3:39pm
Seems like you used kid gloves, actually.
Comment by Howard S. Dunn on January 21, 2010 at 4:51pm
The interesting thing about the Catholics - they include a ton of stuff that isn't even in their book.

Half the stations of the cross are not there.

vials of Elvis' tears ... wait - whaaa? I hope the put them up on eBay - I'm gonna WIN that auction - count on it!
Comment by D.O.S on January 21, 2010 at 11:50am
"What about The Shroud of Turin argument? I don't understand what Christians think it is proof of. Please educate me my atheist brothers and sisters."
Black Sectarian Thought

Shroud is proof of only one thing: disdain for science. Three separate labs have carbon dated to over a 1000 years after Christ supossedly lived and died. It's a fake and anyone with a brain who also happens to also be literate should realize it by now.
 

Members (397)

 
 
 

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service