At least two groups are making progress.
Computer Program Recognizes Any Language
New technology that allows computers to recognise any language without pre-learning stands to revolutionise automatic speech recognition.
...Professor Torbjørn Svendsen of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and fellow research colleagues have been testing an innovative approach to creating next-generation speech recognition technology.
The next step for the Norwegian researchers is to develop a language-independent module for use in designing competitive speech recognition products.
Microsoft Is Developing A Universal Translator. Yes, That Thing Fro...
According to Technology Review, a Microsoft researcher is close to creating a real one. “In a demonstration at Microsoft’s Redmond, Washington, campus on Tuesday, Microsoft research scientist Frank Soong showed how his software could read out text in Spanish using the voice of his boss, Rick Rashid, who leads Microsoft’s research efforts,” they reported. “In a second demonstration, Soong used his software to grant Craig Mundie, Microsoft’s chief research and strategy officer, the ability to speak Mandarin.”
The website has sound files on Soong’s demonstration and they’re pretty impressive. “In English, a synthetic version of Mundie’s voice welcomed the audience to an open day held by Microsoft Research, concluding, ‘With the help of this system, now I can speak Mandarin.’ The phrase was repeated in Mandarin Chinese, in what was still recognizably Mundie’s voice,” wrote TR.
Soon has been developing the universal translator technology with fellow colleagues from Microsoft Research Asia...
The system can read text in an individuals own voice with about an hour of training, similar to dictation software years ago. As of right now, the technology can translate between any pair of 26 languages.
“The word is just one part of what a person is saying,” says Shrikanth Narayanan, ”Preserving voice, preserving intonation, those things matter, and this project clearly knows that. Our systems need to capture the expression a person is trying to convey, who they are, and how they’re saying it.”
Microsoft’s universal translator (they aren’t actually calling it that) is still being perfected so there’s no date yet as to when it would be available for public consumption.
Tags: speech recognition, universal translator
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on August 24, 2012 at 6:08am With Google Translate as available and facile as it is, and with voice and speech recognition a regular feature on many smart phones, I suppose it's not too surprising to see the integration of those two technologies plus some additional tweaks give rise to one of Star Trek's favorite toys. I would be concerned about mistranslation and pattern recognition failures (which I see happen here and there), but this is yet one more powerful technology which Star Trek suggested and which has come to fruition two centuries earlier than that show predicted.
The Transporter, however, is liable to be a very different matter!
Permalink Reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on November 19, 2012 at 10:42pm Photons don't count, right?
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on December 7, 2012 at 8:05am Photons are ONE thing. PROTONS are quite another ... as is the whole business of E=MC2. Transporting ANYTHING, never mind a human, you're dealing with a whole lot of matter, which means ALL that matter has to be converted to one HELL of a lot of energy, moved in a coherent fashion to some other location, then PRECISELY reassembled, right down to the last atom.
Lawrence Krauss dealt with this issue in his book, The Physics of Star Trek. A fun read and well worth your time.


Christy Stewart Online

George Gordner III Online

Two Cult Survivor Online

Tony Carroll Online

G Online

Loren Miller Online


Sentient Biped Online
Posted by Two Cult Survivor on May 21, 2013 at 11:30am 0 Comments 0 Likes
I posted the bulk of this on another thread, but wanted to add some context separately.
I finally confronted my faith and embraced the fact of my atheism late last August, 2012. Days after I revealed my "epiphany" to a few friends who knew me from another message board, my sister died from Lou Gehrig's Disease (which pissed her off because she hated catching a disease from someone she never f---ed).
THAT was my sister, understand? She was a beautiful, life-loving, potty-mouthed…
ContinuePosted by Larry Taylor on May 20, 2013 at 8:15pm 7 Comments 2 Likes
OK. I am venting. My mother died two weeks ago. She was a “god fearing christian.” Before her death she refused all medical treatment. She wanted to be left alone. She even refused to speak with my brother who is a methodist minister. He is a pip, let me tell you! I suspect she did not believe, but a woman born in her time could not and did not state her actual beliefs. This is the opening salvo to all christians; FUCK YOU! I had so many people come and tell…
ContinuePosted by Christy Stewart on May 20, 2013 at 2:17pm 6 Comments 0 Likes
This probably should not have shocked me as much as it did (especially since I am in Texas). I actually thought my coworkers were playing a joke on me because they know I am an atheist. Sadly, this was no joke. This actually happened.
I work in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who admit patients are general MDs. (Psychiatrists see patients after admission) Yesterday evening we received several calls from irate parents. A new doctor who was doing admissions yesterday actually…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 1:09pm 3 Comments 1 Like
What do you think of this,
Nathan Young,
No Jason Torpy it is you that should be banned for promoting atheism, a belief that has no foundation in reality and zero proof behind it. The letter was a mockery of your atheist beliefs. I request to the board here that they remove Jason for his unverifiable beliefs in atheism for which he has no proof other than his arrogance. The letter was a mockery of atheism. Atheism is stupid and it should be mocked and it…
Continue© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.