I wrote this commentary on Abrams' effort back in May of 2009. I have to say, I don't think my observations have changed that much, but here's one factoid for you all: it was around this time that I was also collecting The Original Series, also on Blu-Ray. I've had multiple sessions of that collection out and enjoyed them between here and now. On the other hand, I'm not sure I've watched its reboot start-to-finish so much as once. That said, submitted for your approval:
All the above said, I will admit to grudgingly liking it, though mostly as a shoot-em-up space opera. I have to wonder if Abrams ever bothered to watch Wrath of Khan for its drama or The Voyage Home for its humor, or if he just took the characters on a sheet of paper and projected his take onto them. His characters manage not to be caracatures, but neither do most of them really find the original gang, and yes, I do insist on working from the originals. They're the reason Abrams has anything to work with in the first place and they deserve more respect and effort than was shown here. Lazy writing and an overemphasis on effects does not science-fiction make, and honestly, that is mostly what J. J. Abrams has given us.
Tags: J. J. Abrams, Star Trek
I agree with you Loren. He basically just did a time line story so that he could mess with the canon. So everything is up for grabs now.I think he is trying to reinvent the Star Trek Universe. I prefer the original - yes.
I also loved the original Spock.
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on February 22, 2013 at 10:35am Utterly agreed. I will admit to enjoying space opera, but Star Trek has too often demonstrated that it can be something MORE than that. The sad fact is that I see no such demonstration with Abrams' opus here, and Into Darkness looks very little different.
Joan Denoo replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Cicadas taste like asparagus in the group THE KNIFE & FORK
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion Girl Recovered After 10 Years Claimed Dead by Psychic in the group Hang With Friends
Tom Sarbeck replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Top industries all depend on externalities in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Edison Sullivan replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You
Debra Stevenson commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Salvation Army and religious charities discriminating© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

