Who didn't see this coming??!!  What do you think?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/2010/oct/12/doctor-who-immor...


The link is above.  The text is below! 











































































Doctor Who is now immortal, reveals the BBC


Edict that Time Lords can regenerate only 12 times before they die has been quietly ditched


































Tom Baker played the fourth Doctor Who
Tom Baker played the fourth Doctor Who in The Deadly Assassin (1976). Photograph: BBC


He travels through time and space, saves the Earth, and has millions of fans all over the world. But as every "Whovian" knows, the Doctor cannot last for ever: Time Lords are able to regenerate only 12 times
before they die.

Fans have always thought that the 13th doctor would be the last, thanks to a 1976 Doctor Who episode, The Deadly Assassin, featuring Tom Baker as the Doctor in his fourth incarnation, and revealing for the first time the
regeneration limit. But a passing comment in a children's television
programme later this month is set to rewrite history and cast the
Doctor, iconic hero of the world's most successful and longest-running science fiction series, as immortal.

The moment comes in the CBBC spin-off show, The Sarah Jane Adventures, which stars former companion Elisabeth Sladen as Sarah Jane Smith. Matt
Smith, who plays the current Doctor Who, guest stars in a two-part
episode called The Death of the Doctor, to be screened on October 25
and 26. While the Doctor and Clyde Langer, played by Daniel Anthony, are
in the process of outwitting spooky vulture undertakers the Shansheeth,
Clyde asks how many times he can regenerate. The Doctor indicates that
there is no limit. The action continues.

Fans of the show have been expecting an official moving of the goalposts for some time, but it was anticipated as part of the Christmas special, rather than in an
after-school slot on the CBBC channel.

Back in 1976, 12 regenerations must have felt like a safely distant number to pluck from the ether. Now, however, with Smith playing the character in his 11th
incarnation, circumventing the rule has begun to feel rather urgent. As
JK Rowling hinted last week, once a hero has conquered the world, it is
hard to put him away for good: we may also see an extension to the
seven-book Harry Potter franchise, despite its very final ending and
Nineteen Years Later epilogue.

And with the Doctor Who brand constantly expanding (including spin-offs that range from lunchboxes to the Doctor Who Live show currently on a 25-date, nine-city tour) it
was hardly likely that the BBC was going to call time on the series.

It was a stroke of PR genius to slip the hotly anticipated fudging of the Doctor's longevity into a children's series: the episodes are now sure
to draw in the viewers. However, Whovians (famously likened by Sarah
Jane creator Russell T Davies to a swarm of mosquitoes) will be
disappointed that there is no technical reason given for the change: it
is simply stated in passing.

Whovian Simon says: "Many of us old-timers have looked forward to the story that addresses the end of the Doctor's life span. I'm gutted that it appears that something so
integral to the show's long-term storyline has been passed over in this
way."

The BBC would not say whether there would be any further explanation. "We never comment on future storylines for Doctor Who," said a spokeswoman.











Tags: doctor, immortal, immortality, regeneration, who

Views: 6

Replies to This Discussion

Sorry for all the spaces and weird links and what not :p
I'm not sure what this could mean, and honestly, I don't think it has any bearing on the show (DW) and his regenerations.....I mean, it's said in passing, in a sort of absent-minded way I presume....we all know how absent-minded this Doctor can be.....and we're not at all sure what Death of the Doctor truly means. It's Sarah Jane not Doctor Who. Though the two shows are related....one just being a spinoff it can't suggest the doctor's new lives or the actual DW canon, can it.....?? seems bizarre.

They are going to have to do something about the doctor's future selves.....but making him immortal?? Everyone and everything must die. How will they get around this!? They will have to make it so that he can go on.....but how? Interesting.

It is almost a slap in the face though (if it is true) that it is done in such a way...on a spinoff show (of which i'm a fan) and in such passing.........Something of this magnitude need be done on the show itself....and with great precision, magnification and justice. Perhaps this is just a seed....meant to stir things up.....who knows? It could have nothing at all to do with his regenerations either.

I will post links to this ep in particular...or at least a clip tho so we can judge for ourselves the manner in which he says this and the likelihood of it being relevant to the actual show...DW.
me either....as I said...we can't really take this for anything. It's said in passing, as real quick answer to Clyde I believe....you know how people like to start this kind of stuff!!! But as we know, speculating is fun!!

And yes! I love the classics....

RSS

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service