This is a group to discuss the joy of being childless! I am amazed at the number of atheists I have met over the past few years that are childless by choice, here is a place to discuss stories and experiences!
Members: 378
Latest Activity: on Wednesday
Started by Jonel Burge. Last reply by TNT666 on Wednesday. 2 Replies 0 Likes
Started by dr kellie. Last reply by TNT666 Feb 6. 31 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Prog Rock Girl. Last reply by Steph S. Jan 31. 12 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Maruli Marulaki. Last reply by sk8eycat Jan 30. 20 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Jonel Burge. Last reply by Gwaithmir Jan 28. 6 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Maruli Marulaki. Last reply by Kiljoy616 Jan 24. 18 Replies 0 Likes
Started by sk8eycat. Last reply by Joseph Heston Dec 30, 2011. 9 Replies 0 Likes
Started by jenny. Last reply by Joseph Heston Dec 30, 2011. 8 Replies 0 Likes
Started by damian. Last reply by Prog Rock Girl Dec 7, 2011. 8 Replies 0 Likes
Started by damian. Last reply by damian Dec 4, 2011. 2 Replies 0 Likes
Comment
Just making sure you are consistent.
Kosak... the illusion that "in nature" all females live but to reproduce is an self delusion. There are many species where all females do not breed constantly, or at all, they play other social roles. Females roles in life is not defined by our breeding capacity... specially not humans. Now if you were a rat or a cockroach... maybe...
My mother's breeding capacity was also objectified and denied choice. My mother in many ways was not a fit mother. From the outside looking in... seeing how life has turned out for myself and my siblings, due to family stresses... I certainly should have been aborted, and my siblings... possibly not worth being born either.
So you object to being born then.
Do you see your mother as just an object because she dared to have you?
@PRG, as a 45 y/o non breeding female biologist, I agree with his outlook. I don't see pregnancy as a female choice, but as a patriarchal imposition. In our society, breeding is done for economic purposes, to keep the wheels of the machine rolling, women are but units of production, and I work for that not to be so.
I do find breeders offensive, to a certain degree, a degree similar to the offensiveness as religious people. You see I have religious friends and breeding friends... both groups of friends know I have serious 'issues' with their life choices, as they have issues with my candor.
As for the child abuse... it need not be scary to be child abuse... it's the very principal of brainwashing a person who's brain is not yet fully developed, especially when it's taxpayer money paying for it. I find it worse when society does it than when the parent does it, though I hate both aspects.
I don't care much about the word breeder, but I think this sentence is pretty derogatory: "Having children is to reduce the woman to the status of an object, to make her a slave to the species. She becomes a "breeder," a machine for breeding." This mostly reveals what you think of women, Francois. Having children can make people a lot of things but it doesn't make them into objects.
It was child abuse to me. Try living into your teenage years "knowing" you are an abomination because you are gay. Fucked up. Or how about being 10 years old and worrying about your atheist grandmother burning in hell...
I guess it would depend of how the indoctrination happens. Maybe I am just naive, but I think it would be possible to get a kid to believe without scaring them shitless. After all, they do believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.
© 2012 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.
You need to be a member of The Childless and Godless to add comments!