Hi All,
Am I the only person who recognises the logo for this group as being very similar to the Egyptian Amarna period artistic representations of the sun god, the aten, around 1350BC.
It's amusing that an atheist group has accidentally chosen a symbol which, during pharoah Akhenaten's reign, was used to represent the one true God...which was a massive break with traditional egyptian spiritualism which had masses of gods. Pharoah Akhenaten threw out all the other gods and replaced them with this one sun/sun god and had this symbol carved everywhere he could. After he died it didn't take long for the old gods to be brought back and carvings like this were systematically virtually vandalised out of the historical record.
So..this is the symbol of the one true god, and/or the symbol for the atheistic Brights. :-)
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Kevin Edward Dolan on February 28, 2010 at 5:52am
Permalink Reply by Limber Lightfoot on February 28, 2010 at 6:10am
Permalink Reply by Kevin Edward Dolan on February 28, 2010 at 6:38am
Permalink Reply by Limber Lightfoot on February 28, 2010 at 2:32pm
Permalink Reply by Davis Jacobson on August 1, 2010 at 8:23am
Permalink Reply by Michael Marler on August 27, 2011 at 1:48pm I saw an opening eye that radiated the light of self awareness. And puppies.
Permalink Reply by House on October 27, 2011 at 11:12pm Interesting thread; I just found the nexus this evening.
Ancient religious traditions have no ownership over any image. Is Egyptology interesting? Hell yeah! You could follow up this logic by pointing out that paleolithic cave paintings also used similar images such as the 'sun cross.' Observation of the bright object in the sky probably does not endow a culture with a logo trademark.
It is, in fact, more fitting to use this image to belabor the obvious point that ideas are recycled generation after generation. 'The Brights' image belongs to Egyptian mythology as much as a tattoo belongs to a corpse. A candle in the dark could illustrate the same meaning just as well, perhaps better.
James M. Martin replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You
G posted a status
Pat replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

