Atheist Nexus

The World’s Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!

When surveyed, most people say they get tattoos or unconventional piercings to express individuality. But could something more psychologically primal be afoot? Researchers at the University of Wroclaw in Poland measured about 200 men and women—half of them inked or pierced in places other than their earlobes—for body symmetry, or how similar their right and left sides are. (More similarity indicates genetic health and is associated with sexual attractiveness.)

Among the research subjects, men with bodily decorations exhibited greater symmetry than those without, whereas no differences emerged in women. Because people who are less symmetric did not opt more often for tattoos and piercings, researchers rejected one widely held hypothesis that suggested people use physical graffiti to hide or distract from imperfections in their appearance.

The results jibe with a different theory—getting stuck with needles can endanger one’s health via infections, so the study supports the evolutionary “handicap” theory that only those with high biological quality can afford such risky behavior. The im­pulse to get inked may be a risk-taking behavior inherited from ancestors who were strong enough to endure injuries and survive—as opposed to those whose ancestors survived by avoiding risk and injury. Therefore, at least in men, body art could serve as an “honest” signal of fitness in the Darwinian sense. So maybe that’s why pierced, tattooed rock stars do so well with the ladies.

Source: Scientific American
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=survival-of-the-ta...

Views: 26

Support Nexus

Click to Buy Amazon items and help A|N

Advertisements

Heathen's Guide

Your Ad Here

Helpful Items

 

Search Atheist Nexus:
Translate page:
 
Social Networking Links:
 

Latest Activity

Joan Denoo replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
8 minutes ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Alexandra's discussion Need help with irreducible complexity
17 minutes ago
Tom Sarbeck commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
34 minutes ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
36 minutes ago
paul babcock replied to Jessica's discussion Just an interesting observation
54 minutes ago
Tom Sarbeck commented on Donald R Barbera's blog post Coming to a Head?
58 minutes ago
Nerdlass posted a photo
1 hour ago
paul babcock replied to John Hutcheson's discussion Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, Who's playing?
1 hour ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Alexandra's discussion Need help with irreducible complexity
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
1 hour ago
paul babcock liked Loren Miller's discussion Morals in Men - Morals in Chimps - Why? (CNN - Kelly Murray)
1 hour ago
John Hutcheson posted a discussion
1 hour ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Jessica's discussion Just an interesting observation
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to James M. Martin's discussion Breitbart Group Claims "New Evidence" Hitler Was Gay in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
2 hours ago
Andrew Fuller posted a photo
2 hours ago
Rachel Riley commented on Donald R Barbera's blog post Child Abuse & Religion
2 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
2 hours ago
Andrew Fuller commented on Steph S.'s group Geek & Nerd Haven
2 hours ago
The Flying Atheist replied to James M. Martin's discussion St. Anthony Falls Bridge, Minnesota in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
2 hours ago
Steph S. commented on Steph S.'s group Geek & Nerd Haven
2 hours ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service