Information

Secular Sexuality

(NSFW) A no-taboo approach to sexual education and health.

Website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sexuality
Members: 670
Latest Activity: on Tuesday

Sex for fun and non-procreation!

In this world, we can't get away from religion. We've been exposed to false information regarding contraception failure rates and experienced the STD scare tactics. Some of us may even have gone through abstinence-only sex education!

Here in Secular Sexuality we will discuss:

-sexual health in light of peer-reviewed science
-safe for work guides on safe(r) sex (or links)
-questions that would shock the religious

This discussion forum is moderated. Unsophisticared trolls and judging other people will not be tolerated. If you would like to see a topic addressed, or have a question, add it to the comment wall, or message an admin.

Message The Nerd if you want an invite to the X-rated group, for topics not allowed on Atheist Nexus.

Discussion Forum

Cliteracy

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Luara Jul 10. 4 Replies

BDSM

Started by BJ Saylor. Last reply by Joseph P Jul 7. 17 Replies

Sex Tips

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jun 10. 6 Replies

Ezekiel 23:20 – Bible Porn?

Started by Garaidh Mac an tSaoir. Last reply by Gwaithmir May 14. 5 Replies

What do you yell in bed?

Started by Angie Jackson. Last reply by Gwaithmir Mar 24. 137 Replies

Beautiful Cervix

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Craigart14 Mar 21. 7 Replies

Non-monogamy

Started by Pockets. Last reply by Mink Laubenthal Jan 16. 30 Replies

FREEOK 2013 - Emily Boyer: "Secular Facts on Sexual Acts"

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Loren Miller Jul 2, 2013. 2 Replies

gender reveal parties

Started by dr kellie. Last reply by TNT666 Jun 27, 2013. 25 Replies

Men have sex and women make love. Or do they?

Started by Tom Sarbeck. Last reply by dr kellie Jun 24, 2013. 8 Replies

Clits 101

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jun 18, 2013. 5 Replies

FS: My virginity mistake

Started by A Former Member. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jun 18, 2013. 3 Replies

On sexual objectification and subjectivication

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Tom Sarbeck May 3, 2013. 18 Replies

Does sex keep you younger?

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Tom Sarbeck May 3, 2013. 9 Replies

Music during sex

Started by Splurgen. Last reply by Glenn Friedman Apr 10, 2013. 48 Replies

How flirty is too flirty for a married person?

Started by Saint Fillan. Last reply by Kevin Boleyn Mar 27, 2013. 9 Replies

Sexual Harassment and Assault at Hooters

Started by EJN. Last reply by Gwaithmir Mar 22, 2013. 21 Replies

In Soviet Russia Orgasm has You

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joseph P Mar 19, 2013. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Secular Sexuality to add comments!

Comment by TNT666 on November 8, 2011 at 8:51pm

Comment by TNT666 on November 8, 2011 at 12:43am
Nope, I don't buy it for an instant, the crying child eventually finds comfort in mother's arms. Any psychotic anger/distrust I would think would get directed, if not at other males, then at all humans, not at the individual which actively provides most of the active loving, following after the male who caused the pain in the first place. If you really wanted to test your hypothesis, you'd have find studies which study the prevalence of misogyny among various groups of males, of which intact and cut. I doubt you'd find any correlation, but go ahead.
Comment by Tom Sarbeck on November 8, 2011 at 12:25am

What led you to infer the gender of the person who did the cutting?

"Is it possible, that since for most men our mothers are our first caregivers AFTER WE ARE BROUGHT HOME FROM WHERE THE CUTTING TOOK PLACE, that we associate the pain of cutting with our mothers and misogyny results?

Comment by TNT666 on November 8, 2011 at 12:16am

Since all but a very small percentage of circumcisions were performed by females, I don't see why any misogyny would be justifiable...

I met a guy on a personals this week, my age, from the USA, who'd never, ever, met any intact male, or heard of any locally, I was dumbfounded. I pleaded with him to never to that to any potential son of his. He asked what was different in bed... I gladly volunteered :)

Comment by Tom Sarbeck on November 7, 2011 at 11:59pm

When I started thinking about circumcision and its effects, I came to see that its purpose is:

1. to persuade boys to trust no one, or

2. to make unnecessary pulling the foreskin back before peeing and thereby reducing the chances that boys would discover masturbation.

Though not Jewish, my mom's doctor was and I was born in a Jewish hospital. They cut me and years later my mom told me that when she brought me home I trusted no one. Why was I not surprised?

Is it possible, that since for most men our mothers are our first caregivers, that we associate the pain of cutting with our mothers and misogyny results?

Any other opinions?

 

Comment by A Former Member on November 7, 2011 at 1:00pm
I got this from another site, and a guy who posted it basically said faith trumps the welfare of the child. Some people are such morons.
Comment by A Former Member on November 7, 2011 at 12:51pm

Lost Boys: An Estimate of U.S. Circumcision-Related Infant Deaths

 

Baby boys can and do succumb as a result of having their foreskin removed. Circumcision-related mortality rates are not known with certainty; this study estimates the scale of this problem. This study finds that approximately 117 neonatal circumcision-related deaths (9.01/100,000) occur annually in the United States, about 1.3% of male neonatal deaths from all causes. Because infant circumcision is elective, all of these deaths are avoidable. This study also identifies reasons why accurate data on these deaths are not available, some of the obstacles to preventing these deaths, and some solutions to overcome them.

 

Must pay for the PDF if you want it.

Comment by Jim Mo. on October 27, 2011 at 10:48am

Porn Is Ruining The Sex Lives Of An Entire Generation

Brain science? No distinction between vividly imagined and actual physical experience? Can overexposure make sex boring? Good for population control? Where is the simple answer?

Comment by TNT666 on October 24, 2011 at 11:57am

@JP, which is exactly why I stated that before we can be completely open about youths' sexuality, in order to prevent bad situations, parents need to step up to the plate and better prepare their progeny for all of life's adventures. Our mental states are artificial but our hormones are not. Our hormonal sexual lust has evolved over millions of years and to attempt to deny it for the sake of prolonged childhood is simply not healthy for humans. It leads to psychological traumas.

And for the sake of this argument, the few GOPs I've met in my life didn't know left from right in biology.

It is not only on the topic of sexuality, it happens in many areas of discussion about "modern humans", so many people think we can just turn off evolution with the snap of a finger in order to accommodate the whims of our 'modern' civilisation. Biologically, humans ARE as we were 10s of 1000s of years ago.

Comment by TNT666 on October 24, 2011 at 11:48am

I thought it was Richard Knight's wall?

Anyway, the articles were not primarily about pedophilia but about the sexual attractions and instincts of boys (whatever age groups 'boys' mean).

 

Members (670)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service