Where on the Kinsey Scale do you rate yourself?

0 Exclusively heterosexual
1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual; bisexual.
4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6 Exclusively homosexual
7 Asexual

Tags: Kinsey, Scale

Views: 560

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Black Magick Woman on August 5, 2010 at 4:54pm
Probably 1 or 2, but most women get on my nerves too much for my tastes lol.
Permalink Reply by Jezzy on August 5, 2010 at 6:06pm
7...

Or maybe 1-2?
Permalink Reply by Florrie64 on August 10, 2010 at 7:56am
Up until my thirties I was a 0, now I am a 3, although I have never had a relationship with another woman just sex so would this make me a 2 instead? Either way I am equally attracted to men and women.
Permalink Reply by Little Name Atheist on August 18, 2010 at 9:59pm
I'm still a Three.
Permalink Reply by Jaume on August 19, 2010 at 4:21am
Where on the Kidney Scale do you rate yourself?

0 My urine is as pristine as St Augustine's
1 Sometimes I think I may have evolved from a dromedary
2 I usually eat kidneys with some fava beans and a nice Chianti
3 I've always been good at calculus
4 I've been transplanted thrice already
5 I've been Hugo's inspiration for the Hunchback of Notre-Dame because of my bulging kidneys
6 Why does it hurt when I pee?
7 My name is Annie Sprinkle
Permalink Reply by Ann on August 19, 2010 at 4:40am
I'm 1 on Anyone's scale, 2 on Jaume's scale. (I get calculus only when stoned).
Permalink Reply by Jason Spicer on August 19, 2010 at 12:57pm
I bet you get calculus if you don't brush your teeth.
Permalink Reply by Black Magick Woman on August 19, 2010 at 5:06am
A 2, but unlike Ann, I suck at calculus stoned or sober..
Permalink Reply by Rob van Senten on August 19, 2010 at 9:02am
0 Exclusively heterosexual

Men can be good looking to me but not sexually attractive.
Women on the other hand can be sexually attractive to me without being necessarily good looking.
Permalink Reply by Jenni Manwaring on August 19, 2010 at 3:46pm
Most definitely a 2.
Permalink Reply by Noh Name on August 20, 2010 at 9:11am
An entomologist turned sexologist. He did some studies in the 50's about sex and wrote books discussing his findings. Ground breaking work in America. For a brief intro watch the movie Kinsey with Liam Neeson. I'm not to sure how accurate a biography it was but it's a interesting watch, and would give you some idea about it.
Permalink Reply by Noh Name on August 20, 2010 at 9:25am
I'm a 2.5

RSS

CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS

Latest Activity

John Hutcheson posted a blog post

Are the media too giddy over the Pope?

With all the media attention the on the Pope, important stories are being missed, human rights violations, Monsanto protection act, Russia march to blasphemy laws, and of the big story this week did Harry Potter vanquish dementors?See More
20 minutes ago
0 Comments
Ian Mason commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
"The medical profession seems to have improved in some areas at least. Personally I think some of that is due to the higher level of education of society as a whole. We know too much to put up with bad treatment now. I saw a documentary last year…"
21 minutes ago
Ian Mason commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
30 minutes ago
Nerdlass replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Cicadas taste like asparagus in the group THE KNIFE & FORK
"Thanks. Now I have "Glory of Love" stuck in my head. ^^; I'm not sure if I could get used to eating bugs. It's like... if they're mudbugs or sea-bugs, that's one thing, but it's hard to imagine them tasting good…"
30 minutes ago
Nerdlass commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Some Wiccans and their seeking approval from Christians
"I converted to paganism (through wicca, but didn't stay there) from xianity. During that conversion period, I tried to reconcile the beliefs, which ultimately, I couldn't. There are some who find a way (probably used to cherry picking, so…"
40 minutes ago
Hiram replied to Hiram's discussion Epicureanism: a Secular Doctrine for Happiness
"There are currently two Gardens of Epicurus: one in Chicago and one in New Jersey.  Please visit if you're in the vecinity!"
54 minutes ago
Hiram commented on Maruli Marulaki's group Epicurean Atheists
"There are currently two Gardens of Epicurus: one in Chicago and one in New Jersey.  Please visit if you're in the vecinity!"
56 minutes ago
Hiram commented on Hiram's blog post That Old Time Secularism
"There are currently two Gardens of Epicurus: one in Chicago and one in New Jersey.  Please visit if you're in the vecinity!"
57 minutes ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service