Has anyone, everyone read the book, Sex at Dawn. My favorite line is, "Darwin called your mother a whore". Of course the gist of the book is controversial, since they argue much evidence points to humans being very much like bonobos, evolving to have communities of multiple partner sex.
This should get all the religious folks upset and a good many atheist, monogamists also...
Can't imagine why it would upset any rational person. Evidence of our evolution is just that, evidence. What we do or don't view as ethical is another matter entirely.
Evidence of our evolution is just that, evidence. What we do or don't view as ethical is another matter entirely.
Ran into that head-on in a recent Anthropology class. Fundie Xian who kept getting all defensive over the facts, with the professor and many of the rest of us continually telling him, "Dude, no one is making an ethical judgement either way. It's simply a stated fact."
I've just finished it and I highly recommend it to everyone. Being a biology major, I found the section "Bodies in Motion," which discusses the evidence from ape (humans included) anatomy, particularly fascinating. It's interesting to notice how many scientists are content to ignore overwhelming evidence in order to go on believing in what the authors, Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jethá, refer to as the "standard narrative" of human sexuality. To quote Richard Dawkins,
"Is it so very obvious that we can't love more than one person? We seem to manage it with parental love (parents are reproached if they don't at least pretend to love all their children equally), love of books, of food, of wine (love of Château Margaux does not preclude love of a fine Hock, and we don't feel unfaithful to the red when we dally with the white), love of composers, poets, holiday beaches, friends...why is erotic love the one exception that everyone instantly acknowledges without even thinking about it?"