Science Fiction/Fantasy Atheists

Information

Science Fiction/Fantasy Atheists

Atheists enjoy speculative stories as they *should* be enjoyed: for entertainment purposes only, not to be confused with reality. Members here can have fun discussiung the literature, movies, TV, etc.

Members: 400
Latest Activity: Nov 5

Welcome science fiction & fantasy fans!

As a science fiction/fantasy writer myself, I enjoy taking voyages into the unknown. Looking at the universe as it isn't often helps us put the real world into perspective. It's also fun to take an occasional vacation from the often-harsh reality around us. Unlike the theists, the religionists, the god-groupies who feel compelled to live in fantasy realms, we visit them and then come back home--and then go voyaging again.

I hope you'll all feel free to congregate here and compare your experiences in other worlds and times.

Discussion Forum

Deathsworn Arc - Atheist Fantasy Novels.

Started by Martyn Stanley. Last reply by Hunter Byrd Nov 5. 2 Replies

Climate Change as a Sci-Fi film

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Plinius Jul 9. 1 Reply

Imagine aliens altering Earth's orbit

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Luara May 6. 2 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Science Fiction/Fantasy Atheists to add comments!

Comment by Leslee Love on April 1, 2009 at 10:41pm
Stephen...first of all, I'm almost done. Second, I agree that the monster movies are atrocious and make me want to poke me eyes out. I never got into the Stargate saga either, and do not watch GH, or wrestling (although my son does). During the day though, while I'm slaving away, they run marathons: my faves? Twilight Zone, Doctor Who, Sarah Jane Adventures, Eureka, and more. The daytime is brilliant. I vote they call the new SciFi channel....???? Because SyFy looks too fairylike.
Comment by MJ on April 1, 2009 at 10:34pm
well, I'd agree the programming on SciFi or SyFy has really gone downhill, and all the good shows are getting axed right and left...

time to find new channels... when I ever find time to sit and watch....
Comment by Stephen Goldin on April 1, 2009 at 10:28pm
Richard--I absitively guarantee you'll love Eureka. I don't know any intelligent, scientific person who doesn't.

"Syfy" is actually a corruption of a corruption. Old-time science fiction fans like me hate the term sci-fi; it seems like such a put-down. (Harlan Ellison said "sci-fi" is the sound of two crickets fucking.) I'm given to understand that the real reason behind the name change is because they couldn't trademark the term "sci fi."

Since I never really got into the Stargate saga (which is not meant as a slam at them), the only thing I watch on that channel any more is Eureka. Certainly not wrestling or haunted houses crap. Those monster-of-the-week movies they make are so lame they should be rated NB. (That's Needs Bots, for you old MST-3K fans.) Comedy Central is starting up a new show next week that sounds promising: an s&s parody called Krod Mandoon and the Flaming Sword of Fire. Could be funny.
Comment by MJ on April 1, 2009 at 9:09pm
@richard valcourt: Devil in the Dark was def. one of my fav. eps from ST.
I have not seen the end of PD, so I'm disappointed to hear there won't be anymore and that it ended on a cliff hanger... pooh... I'm waiting for the DVD to be available...

I'm disappointed beyond belief that SciFi is changing their name to SyFy... or siffy, as I call it... seems iffy to me.
What a way to tell us, the loyal viewers that we're nerds... not even giving us geek status... AND to insinuate that we'd all LIKE SyFy *better*...

Ya know, if it ain't Broke - Don't Fix IT!!!
Comment by Richard Valcourt on April 1, 2009 at 8:50pm
Well, I'm obviously going to have to start paying attention to the SciFi Channel (or SyFy, as they're going to themselves soon). I'd never heard of Eureka, and it looks like I missed some good stuff with Battlestar Galactica. Netflix, here I come.

I absolutely loved Pushing Daises, and I am bummed beyond words that it never made it. Even worse, it ended in a cliffhanger. I hope they're able to put together a TV movie to wrap up the loose ends.

Regarding the Treks, my favorite by far is Next Gen, but the very best from Classic Trek (like "Amok Time" and "Devil in the Dark") still really pack a punch.
Comment by Leslee Love on April 1, 2009 at 10:00am
BSG-frakkin' awesome (writing did go down hill) "Mitochondrial Eve"...pashaww
Flash Gordon-I miss...sigh
Doctor Who-I can't get enough of (and actually created the group TARDIS)--Torchwood is hella good as well!!


My telly is usually always on the SciFi channel!! I'm going to go and buy all the DVD sets of all my fave sf shows...and just veg and eat and enjoy that which is good and science fiction-y!!..
Comment by Stephen Goldin on April 1, 2009 at 9:31am
I can actually recommend renting the DVD of BG Season 1 (new series). It was very well done and well-acted. The acting and the production values were actually good throughout; it's the writing that deteriorated so horribly.

I love Eureka too; looking forward to the new season. PD was fantasy rather than sf, but nothing wrong with that. I agree it was beautiful and fresh, one of the most original shows on the air in many years. Damn...I wish someone could touch it and bring it back to life!
Comment by MJ on April 1, 2009 at 6:15am
I, also, have not watched any of the new BG. I tried really hard, and somewhat succeeded, to enjoy STNG, but the old ST will always have a fond place in my t.v. memories.
Even if I find it hard to watch those old episodes... haha.

I have much more enjoyed the newer, fresher shows, such as Eureka and Pushing Daisies... while I know that PD is more fiction than science, it's an ejoyable waste of time.

MTCW,
MJ
Comment by Richard Valcourt on April 1, 2009 at 2:45am
Drat, I'll have to sit this one out. I've not seen a single episode of the new Battlestar, probably because I have such foul memories of the old Battlestar. Don't worry about spoilers, though. I look forward to seeing the discussion.
Comment by Stephen Goldin on March 31, 2009 at 7:40pm
Okay, I'll start something off. I thought the finale to Battlestar Galactica sucked little pink bunnies. The first couple of years were fantastic, much better than the original series. I thought it was particularly bemusing that the good guys were polytheistic and the bad Cylons were the monotheists. Then it all fell apart in a spiritualistic mishmosh, where no one was sure what was going on. And it all ended with Adam & Eve, as I'd been afraid it would. The ending was more self-indulgent (speaking as a writer) than the AIG bonuses!
 

Members (399)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service