Richard Dawkins

I don't think he needs a description :)

Members: 1478
Latest Activity: Dec 7

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Richard Dawkins to add comments!

Comment by John Grow on July 29, 2009 at 11:10pm
JstN--Life itself is not exactly "energy." Life is based in matter--simple cells copying and copying according to the chromosomes they possess. There is no design or designer. Simple processes writ into so large a collective that one might perceive design or pattern if one were trying to find such a pattern in the first place.

It would be nice to apply a metaphysical overlay like you describe, but for myself I don't think it's necessary at all.
Comment by Itziar Petit on July 15, 2009 at 6:29am
Yes, I know, thats what puzzled mit so much. I can hardly believe that anybody could have the guts uf publishing such a nonsense, and to do it hier! I mean, If i had tried to make the best satire of a christian defense of creationism, I wouldnt have managed to write it better! If anybody would ever try to say something like that hier in Berlin, he would get free tickets to psyquiatrist and a for-ever-seat in the nearest primary school.
Comment by MaleficVTwin on July 14, 2009 at 7:32pm
Itziar, that's laughable. They clearly have no idea what evolution even does. :)
Comment by Itziar Petit on July 14, 2009 at 3:18pm
This thing I see on the right side of the screen. This "Discover, Is evolution true?...". Has anybody taken a serious look at it? Is all that stuff seriously meant? or is it some kind of funky satire? If the last, its really good! Example: " Many educated people accept the theory of evolution. But is it true? Curiously enough, our existence as human beings is one of the best arguments against it. According to evolutionary theory, the traits that offer the greatest advantage for survival are passed from generation to generation. Yet human reproduction itself argues powerfully against this fundamental premise of evolution. If human beings are the pinnacle of the evolutionary process, how is it that we have the disadvantage of requiring a member of the opposite sex to reproduce, when lower forms of life—such as bacteria, viruses and protozoa—are sexless and far more prolific? If they can reproduce by far simpler methods, why can't we? If evolution is true, what went wrong? "
Comment by quietude on July 6, 2009 at 8:24am
Couple of years ago soon after the God Delusion. The act who played the character even looked a bit like him. As they usually do on these shows, they mixed things up a bit and his character had some elements of SJ Gould.
Comment by Aiden on July 5, 2009 at 10:58pm
When was he [portrayed] on Law and Order?
Comment by quietude on July 5, 2009 at 3:04pm
Do we have a list of Dawkins portrayals on tv shows? Like South Park, Law and Order:Criminal Intent??
Comment by Cher Mason on July 5, 2009 at 10:07am
I LOVE this guy! He is my favorite Atheist Celeb.! He's such a sweetie! ;)
Comment by mert can taşdemir on June 30, 2009 at 7:23am
we slogan no islam no god
Comment by Robert Tobin on June 19, 2009 at 9:48pm
THis is a better pic of Little Johnny Howard


Members (1479)


Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon



© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service