Dedicated to realizing the fundamental impulses that drive belief, and seeking secular parallels ~ creating a format for discussion that doesn't address apologetical arguments as much as it replaces the need for those arguments to begin with.
Members: 53
Latest Activity: Dec 15, 2012
Started by Park Bierbower. Last reply by Jedi Wanderer Jun 16, 2012. 11 Replies 1 Like
I was listening to a podcast a few weeks ago, and they were covering the apologetical argument known as Pre-supposational Apologetics. Its a clever argument, hard to refute if you're not already…Continue
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Steph S. Apr 27, 2012. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Analytic Thinking Can Decrease Religious Belief, Study ShowsJust using their "analytic" system of thinking…Continue
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Apr 4, 2012. 1 Reply 0 Likes
New University of Otago research suggests that when non-religious people think about their own death they become more consciously skeptical about religion, but unconsciously grow more receptive to…Continue
Tags: fear of death
Started by Jedi Wanderer. Last reply by Jedi Wanderer Jan 8, 2012. 13 Replies 0 Likes
All of us should by now be intimately familiar with this argument. It is the foundation of the arguments used by a religious friend of mine that I met on MySpace and have argued extensively on the…Continue
Comment
Comment by Joseph P on February 11, 2011 at 9:36am
Comment by Park Bierbower on February 11, 2011 at 8:47am @tara reigle
You sound smart and look hottt, want to hook up???
let me know!
lol
Comment by RejuvenArt on February 11, 2011 at 8:36am I'd kick her! No, I'm just kidding. She's our adorable "puppy" lol. I'm such a softy. Besides, she knows... the second you walk in and look at the torn up sofa (or even if you happen to look at her before the hellacious mess) she tucks her tail and cowers. She does not demonstrate those behaviors when she doesn't tear things apart upon our arrival, but is instead jumping up to lick our faces. So my mind always wanders... She knows what she has done is not something she is permitted to do without consequence... due to her cowering. So why does she do it in first place? She not realize the result of her destructive behavior has consequences until till she is in our presence? Does she remember the consequences at that point? Dogs 'remember' scents (perhaps scientists use a different word than 'remember' to describe the familiarity with their sense of scent). They can be in the presence of a person after several years of absence, and 'know' them, display more excited behaviors to see them than a stranger. I do not think they can apply any recollection of a consequence (if they have one) from a past behavior, when presented with a similar situation to behave differently. But then again, dogs trained for firefighting seem to be able to..? A system of rewards and discipline in combination of patience and repetition is used to train dogs, and train them well. Some are smarter than others, at least from bread to bread. I keep thinking the same thing when I read over a few of the recent discussions - Various animals and life forms, just like humans, seem to have varying ability as to whether or not they can apply a form of intelligence to their complex behaviors. Some may have a degree of intelligence and most may not have any, yet still perform complex behaviors. Through natural selection, those who have a degree of intelligence, such as the octopuses (octopi and/or octopodes - all three are correct boys - octopus comes from greek and then went then to latin - so it became a correct use of plural - but was not the original plural. Octopodes is used when refering to the classification plural - and is rarely used - as we dont often refer to a species by their classification except in scientific circles, and octopuses is the accepted and most commonly used plural in the English language, used in the US and UK - so I'll use octopuses) will be more successful at survival.. eventually bringing the evolution of that species to a higher cognative level and ability - but not every test subject would utilize those potential abilities. This seems to be the most likely scenario if one actually applies their knowledge of varying intelligent application. Some species have evolved furthar than others, with homo sapiens to be the most intelligent species we have experienced thus far.
(first post so be easy on me boys ;)
@wanderer - love your comment! It is astonishing, isn't it!? Those who fail to see how awe-inspiring such things are.. surely need new eyes ;)
Comment by Park Bierbower on February 11, 2011 at 8:29am considering their possible intelligence, maybe we should call them 'octopeople' or 'octopersons?'
lol
Comment by Joseph P on February 11, 2011 at 7:48am
Comment by Park Bierbower on February 11, 2011 at 7:30am
Comment by Jedi Wanderer on February 11, 2011 at 5:30am
Comment by Park Bierbower on February 10, 2011 at 8:31pm btw, when I mentioned squids, its theorized that they use complex patterns and colour shifts to communicate with others. There are very distinct patterns that they use, so its not just for camouflage. Its actually been observed directing the movements of 'schools' through pattern variations. Again, I will source all of this soon.
The real importance of this is, we are not alone. Our ignorance makes us think we are.
Comment by Park Bierbower on February 10, 2011 at 8:28pm Marc, while I can't attest to the capacity of a primate, I know that Octopi do have that capability. As the highest order of invertibrates, they split from our ancestors many million years ago, however, the most advanced vertibrates on the planet have develped skills that mirror our own, and some that surpass. The squid has the ability to change its appearance using its 'thoughts,' and what I mean by that is that they don't dump a chemical that then reacts in their skin~ the cells have the ability to change colour, and are directly linked to their neural network (as far as we know.) Octopi also have the ability to solve complex puzzles after watching another octopi solve it~ and if I remember correctly can actually solve it a different way, once they understand the concept used. They also seem to have the ability to measure and judge~ when put in a box with a hole too small to escape from, they won't even try~ but change that hole by a centimeter or so (so they can fit through) and they will quickly size it up and escape.
They are actually very amazing creatures, and don't get nearly the credit they deserve. as far as faculties similar to ours, they are among the closest on the planet, if not the closest. I will start providing source material on this topic tomorrow morning.
Comment by Marc Draco on February 10, 2011 at 6:17pm
Emma Lennon replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Emma Lennon liked James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Richard Goscicki replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Natalie A Sera replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion New fungus killing cats in Australia in the group Atheist Ailurophiles
Joan Denoo replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Facebook in the group Hang With Friends© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.


You need to be a member of Reforming Counter-Apologetics to add comments!