Recovering from Religion

Information

Recovering from Religion

Unless you were raised by atheist parents, you probably had some recovering to do when you left religion. The purpose of RR is to provide a landing place for people when they jump from religion. With local support groups throughout the US, Canada, UK, and Australia, and real-time resources accessible to everyone, RR is where to turn when faith has lost its luster.

Website: http://www.recoveringfromreligion.org
Location: International
Members: 552
Latest Activity: Jun 25

Discussion Forum

In what way are you still recovering from being brought up religious?

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by James M. Martin Jun 14. 14 Replies

I was brought up in a fundamentalist family.Anyone still dealing with any issues from religion?Do you fear the result of coming out Atheist to your family?Any thoughts are welcome.Continue

Catholic Family / Atheist Wedding - HELP

Started by Megan. Last reply by Tom Sarbeck May 31. 4 Replies

Any one else out there still recovering from Catholic guilt??I come from an extremely Catholic family/upbringing. In 6 days I will be the first person in my entire extended family not to marry a Catholic in a Catholic Church.My biggest source of…Continue

Anyone still deal with anything like this?

Started by Starland Victor Seay. Last reply by Matt Skaggs Aug 26, 2013. 27 Replies

One thing I have noticed is a tendency to "doubt" my new path in life. I still want to reach for the Bible sometimes. I still hesitate somewhat when someone mentions Pascal's "Wager"...LOL! Even though I know that science teaches this and that no…Continue

"Thief in the Night"

Started by cbenhamcox. Last reply by Luara Aug 18, 2013. 2 Replies

Last night I was reading Seth Andrew's book, Deconverted, and I almost fell out of my chair when he discussed being forced to watch the end times film from the 1970's call "A Thief in the Night."  He described some of the scenes, and I had a…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Recovering from Religion to add comments!

Comment by Dyslexic's DOG on February 19, 2013 at 1:18am

True James: Though, the call for Bibles is in secular schools where teaching of Creationism has been banned.  The non-exposure to biblical literature for appraisal of their fertile well nourished, scientific, skeptical minds, still leaves them open to indoctrination from outside their education.

As far as schools teaching creationism, well they do have bibles, though, students are often kept from browsing them without guidance (blinkered access) from religious elders, to prevent them from discovering the thousands of contradictions and conflicts.

Unguided access to the Bible in the early stages of indoctrination is dangerous to religion, due to the numerous discrepancies within.

This unguided access, without my priest's/elder's knowledge was their mistake and exposed their faults.  

This is what led me away from Christianity towards Atheism.

Aye M8! :-D- 

Comment by James M. Martin on February 18, 2013 at 10:59pm

"I know why many atheists actually want bibles in all schools, because, to read it with a young, skeptical, inquiring mind will likely produce an atheist."  Unfortunately, the schools that do have bibles for their students inculcate in them the idea that a Super Santa Claus, his son, and some spook run the universe and have since it was created 5,000 B.C., and that Adam saddled and rode small dinosaurs while Eve listened to a talking snake.  Then, these children grown up and teach the same delusional nonsense to their children.  That is how the bible is already used in some schools.  Worse, used in homes.

Comment by James M. Martin on February 18, 2013 at 10:52pm

@GOD'aye, there is a thing in law called the scintilla of evidence.  A speck.  If there is a speck of evidence, there is more than no evidence; it is brought up in appeals after trials to the court or a jury.  In Jesus's case, it is not only the miracles for which we haven't a scintilla of evidence, it is the man himself.  As far as miracles go, it is interesting that the Book of Acts paints a rival seer, soothsayer, and teacher, Simon Magus, so harshly.  Ever wonder why?  Because Simon was a rival to Reb Yeshua.  The authors of Acts would not have gone to such lengths to lambast Simon were they not afraid his magic would outdo that of Jesus.  Those of us who have actually read Simon Magus's gnostic "gospel" know it to be a literate, often beatifully expressed visionary work, at least as good as any book in the N.T.

Comment by Dyslexic's DOG on February 18, 2013 at 6:58am

Though I don't believe Jesus even performed a single miracle nor healing. There is simply no evidence that is good enough to verify any of his miracles.  As Carl Sagan put it: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". All the evidence for Jesus's miracles are anecdotal evidence(bible (accomplices in deception) and others) and hearsay (Saul/Paul, Josephus,  Pliny, etc...).

Extraordinary evidence would be:

1: A couple of expert witnesses examining each miracle to confirm no trickery was used by Jesus.

2: Two or more Doctors examining patients before and after healing miracles to confirm the person was actually sick and actually cured.

3: The resurrection would require a Doctor confirmed Death Certificate, witnessed by one or more fellow doctors and two or more Doctors confirming that the person has indeed returned to life.

Without any such evidence for any of Jesus's miracles.

They cannot possibly be considered as miracles by any court of law.

The Christians evidence for his miracles cannot be presented in a court of law as valid.

Legally, Jesus performed no miracles whatsoever!

Comment by Dyslexic's DOG on February 18, 2013 at 6:43am

You might think I hate Jesus by my avatar, but, no, I actually still have a soft spot for him.  He was like many others, indoctrinated into believing the Judaic god was benevolent.  He must have been lied to, from a young age to believe he was god's son.  I know a family who lied in the same way to their only son, telling him that he was chosen by god. They are in the church I left.  He still believes he has a special calling from god.  Similar to Jesus's delusion.

Comment by Dyslexic's DOG on February 18, 2013 at 6:32am

I think it was just after the story of the battle of Jericho that I really started to dislike this malevolent god, slaughtering an entire population, including innocents for the glorification of one now war criminal named Joshua.  Yes, massacre those innocent women, children and unborn in the name of god.  That story would be sickening to any rational person.

Not to mention the earlier flood which also killed millions of innocents because of a group of corrupt individuals.  Makes the god of the bible sound useless and mindless.  Surely there were much better ways for an (omniscient) all knowing (thus, knew all the perpetrators) to simply remove those it knew were it's enemies.

Such stupidity certainly doesn't deserve respect, nor worship from moi. 

Comment by Dyslexic's DOG on February 18, 2013 at 6:22am

It was studying the Bible, privately, without my assigned elder, thinking it would make me a better Christian, that led me away from believing.

I decided to read it like any book, from start to finish and ignore the references my elder told me to use.  I wasn't far into the Old Testament before I realized that what I was reading was naive junk, not really worth belief.  The god I thought was omni-benevolent, actually turned out to be an omni-malevolent, narcissistic megalomaniac.  Guilty of extremely stupid crimes against the humans it supposedly loved.   I know why many atheists actually want bibles in all schools, because, to read it with a young, skeptical, inquiring mind will likely produce an atheist.   Because the bible is really an incredibly stupid book. 

Comment by Steph S. on January 6, 2013 at 11:24pm
Thank you Richard! Together we can recover from religion.
Comment by Richard C Brown on January 6, 2013 at 9:02pm

1/6/2013.We are ALL Recovering in some form.Let US Recover Together!!Together We Can !!

Comment by James M. Martin on January 1, 2013 at 9:50am

Paul, the Mayans were astronomers and had a pletora of gods and goddesses (e.g. Ixchel, goddess of fertility and therefore a cognate to the Aphrodite mythos), and they managed to integrate their pantheon in a way that correspondend to the heavens.  There is a ruin of an observatory at Chichen-Itza.  Crop success and thus survival of the species depended on propitiation of these gods. Astronomy's study did not benefit them, although your suggestion comes from a completely different perspective, from a few centuries' advancements in science.

 

Members (551)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service