Discussion, analysis and deconstruction of propaganda, spin, public relations, marketing, disinformation and psyops: its use and abuse and you.
Website: http://www.propagandacritic.com/
Location: Earth
Members: 88
Latest Activity: Jun 11
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Luara May 30. 5 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Nov 3, 2012. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by Dallas the Phallus May 20, 2012. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Фелч Гроган. Last reply by Chris G Jan 19, 2011. 5 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Фелч Гроган. Last reply by Napoleon Bonaparte Jan 18, 2011. 3 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Фелч Гроган. Last reply by Andrew Lafont Jan 8, 2010. 14 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Фелч Гроган. Last reply by Jared Lardo Nov 8, 2009. 3 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Aiden. Last reply by Dallas the Phallus Oct 27, 2009. 2 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Aiden. Last reply by Aiden Aug 17, 2009. 4 Replies 0 Likes
Comment
Comment by Chris G on November 6, 2012 at 7:21pm As it is propiganda the U.S. releases in foreign countries occationally makes it to the President as though it's real news.
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on November 6, 2012 at 12:38pm Chris G
If next year’s NDAA clears the US Senate and is signed by President Obama with the Thornberry-Smith provision intact, then restrictions on propaganda being force-fed to Americans would be rolled back entirety.
That's scary, using tax dollars to propagandize US citizens.
Comment by Chris G on September 10, 2012 at 11:28pm NDAA 2013: Congress approved domestic deceptive propaganda
http://rt.com/usa/news/propaganda-us-smith-amendment-903/
Reauthorizing the indefinite detention of US citizens without charge might be the scariest provision in next year’s defense spending bill, but it certainly isn’t the only one worth worrying about.
An amendment tagged on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 would allow for the United States government to create and distribute pro-American propaganda within the country’s own borders under the alleged purpose of putting al-Qaeda’s attempts at persuading the world against Western ideals on ice. Former US representatives went out of there way to ensure their citizens that they’d be excluded from government-created media blasts, but two lawmakers currently serving the country are looking to change all that.
Congressmen Mac Thornberry (R-TX) and Adam Smith (D-WA) introduced “The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012” (H.R. 5736) last week during discussions for the NDAA 2013. It was voted on by the US House of Representatives to be included in next year’s defense spending bill, which was then voted on as a whole and approved. The amendment updates the antiquated Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987, essentially clarifying that the US State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors may “prepare, disseminate and use public diplomacy information abroad,” but while also striking down a long-lasting ban on the domestic dissemination in America. For the last several decades, the federal government has been authorized to use such tactics overseas to influence foreign support of America’s wars abroad, but has been barred from such strategies within the US. If next year’s NDAA clears the US Senate and is signed by President Obama with the Thornberry-Smith provision intact, then restrictions on propaganda being force-fed to Americans would be rolled back entirety.
Both Congressmen Thornberry and Smith say that the amendment isn’t being pushed to allow for the domestic distribution of propaganda, but the actual text of the provision outlines that, if approved by the Senate and signed by President Barack Obama, that very well could be the case...
Comment by Chris G on January 19, 2011 at 11:39pm Here's a new one about how the recently passed health care legislation is going to bankrupt the U.S. and allow China World domination.
Comment by Napoleon Bonaparte on January 19, 2011 at 9:20pm
Comment by George on January 18, 2011 at 9:56pm
Comment by Aiden on August 18, 2010 at 6:49pm
Comment by Jaume on May 26, 2010 at 7:14am
Joan Denoo replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Lillie replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Debra Stevenson replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Whenever I meet an open atheist.....© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.


You need to be a member of Propaganda to add comments!