I am in favor of living wills. I am opposed to other people deciding that a person should die against that person's wishes.
Beyond those, it gets fuzzier. In theory, I think that a person has the right to decide to end their life if they are making that decision with a clear head (i.e., they are not depressed or otherwise incapacitated). In practice, I fear that people who are terminally ill or disabled will not be screened and treated for depression as vigorously as the able-bodied. It's considered more reasonable for someone who is in pain or who is severely disabled to want to die than for, say, a young healthy woman. The latter would raise alarm bells if she wanted to commit suicide, but the former should too.
Generally I'm against it. It's just so damn hard to figure how where and how to draw the line. Do you treat a patient in a persistent coma with antibiotics? Do you keep them alive with a respirator? feeding tube? code cart? Do you treat them if they develop a cancer?
That's just the life-preserving part of it. Then there's the whole life-ending part.
Do you let them die by withholding the things mentioned above? If so, when do you start withholding? Do you give them a deadly drug (and to blazes with the Hippocratic Oath)? If so, when? After 'x' months of coma? After 'x' failed treatments for cancer? After 'x' degree of disability development from MS or AD or xyzabc syndrome?
And who would create these criteria? And who would enforce them?
What about the people who wish to live by it?
& the state? I don't hear about forced cases in countries that do allow it.
Though I do think there is a problem in cases where this is no active consent.
People who wish to live by what? Euthanasia? Now THAT'S a funny concept. :)
I don't hear about forced cases in countries that do allow it.
Actually there have been some cases that have ended up in court or at least before review boards. It's not common but it does happen. Not surprising of course. Is there anything people can't or won't fuck up if they get the chance?
I've searched my conscience, and I can't for the life of me find any justification for this, and I simply cannot accept that there are on every story two equal and logical sides to an argument.
-- Edward R. Murrow
And may I add to this discussion, Solaris, with George Clooney in a real departure role for him. You may argue that Solaris is less science-fiction than psychological study, based on an intriguing premise, but I think it is worth your time. Cloone...
Colossus, the Forbin Project was pretty reasonable. I read the book ages ago and it does follow the book very closely. I also find it amusing both in its conception of the size of the machine necessary to accomplish that much computing power and t...
Atheists enjoy speculative stories as they *should* be enjoyed: for entertainment purposes only, not to be confused with reality. Members here can have fun discussiung the literature, movies, TV, etc.
The following piece was an experiment in alliteration; the first 2 stanzas in “S”, the last 2 in “M”. My first concern was to make sure it made sense. My second concern was to avoid writing a tongue twister.
For those unfamiliar with the link bet...
The Seamonster Feels like a tool because he's been trying to join groups all after noon but has accidentally been adding random people as friends. Stalker.