Oliver Sacks on Humans and Myth-making
"science springs from a sense of nature’s mysteriousness and the wonder of nature. And there is no need to invoke anything supernatural. Indeed, I think too much involvement in the supernatural may blind one to the wonder of nature."
To look outside oneself for definition, purpose and meaning is to miss the great wisdom that comes with our being.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Napoleon Bonaparte on December 12, 2012 at 9:56pm Great presentation by Mr. Sacks. I agree.
Having participated in this forum for some time I have noticed that some Atheists do not dismiss the supernatural entirely. In my opinion people who embrace the supernatural are inhibited in their thinking rendering them unable to think rationally and freely thereby misunderstanding themselves and the world. Some are mad.

Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on December 12, 2012 at 10:06pm A certain degree of irrationality is inevitable in human beings. It's a function of the fact that humans are not automatons, nor are they computers, nor are they anything within a light-year of being perfect. We make mistakes, we are fallible, we frequently get it wrong before we get it right.
However ... systematized, organized, institutionalized irrationality ... That Is Another Matter ... and that is what religion is. It is irrationality, given permission and license by the culture it occupies, frequently without an attendant recognition of the potential effects of that irrationality: the misinformation and damage which accompanies it. Worse, irrationality which presumes to be true and more: which presumes to have the unvarnished TRUTH, which all humans must believe in or die. Irrationality ascending to such a level is bad enough, but when it assails rational thought, reasoned inquiry and logic and declares them to be somehow flawed and lacking ... clearly, too much rein has been given it, without control, without oversight, without THOUGHT.
Like nothing else on this planet, institutional irrationality is DANGEROUS ... and must be STOPPED.
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to James M. Martin's discussion Why Kids Can't Learn Science
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to James M. Martin's discussion Bill O'Really Claims Monkeys "Proof" That Evolution is Wrong; I Claim O'Reilly is a Buffoon
jay H commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Do you support 'traditional' marriage, vot now ad
booklover replied to Loren Miller's discussion When Christians become a 'hated minority' (John Blake, CNN)
Loren Miller replied to Loren Miller's discussion When Christians become a 'hated minority' (John Blake, CNN)
booklover replied to James M. Martin's discussion Bill O'Really Claims Monkeys "Proof" That Evolution is Wrong; I Claim O'Reilly is a Buffoon
Loren Miller replied to James M. Martin's discussion Bill O'Really Claims Monkeys "Proof" That Evolution is Wrong; I Claim O'Reilly is a Buffoon
booklover replied to Loren Miller's discussion When Christians become a 'hated minority' (John Blake, CNN)
Loren Miller replied to Loren Miller's discussion When Christians become a 'hated minority' (John Blake, CNN)
Loren Miller replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Can Straight Couples Benefit by Emulating Same Sex Couples? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
booklover replied to Loren Miller's discussion When Christians become a 'hated minority' (John Blake, CNN)© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

