Atheist Nexus Logo

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4177
Latest Activity: 5 hours ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Genetically Engineered Fungi are Part Human and Part Yeast

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Donald L. Engel yesterday. 1 Reply

Drug Rejuvenates Stem Cell Functioning in Old Mice

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gerald Payne May 15. 10 Replies

Fossilized Brain

Started by Patricia May 11. 0 Replies

Bud Light Withdraws Offensive Slogan

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 30. 16 Replies

Dinosaur Highway

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 29. 8 Replies

Evolution is a FACT, not a theory.

Started by Idaho Spud. Last reply by Joseph P Apr 25. 15 Replies

L'homme "blanc" n'existe en Europe que depuis 6500 BC

Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 16. 1 Reply

ORIGIN OF ATHEIST PRIDE

Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 15. 196 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Joseph P on October 31, 2011 at 8:02pm
And the Libertarians will turn us into a third world country. What a bright future.

I don't think people feel like having this comment board turned into a Libertarian preach board.
Comment by AtheistTech on October 31, 2011 at 7:57pm
If anyone does not see me as an equal, does it follow that they are better than me? Does it follow that I should challenge them (since they are better than me) to come up with a better solution?
Comment by AtheistTech on October 31, 2011 at 7:52pm
Why? Is it offensive? If you and the majority practice the process of considering everyone your equal, you will win the majority, then the theists will become the minority. Then doing what Ayn Rand suggests will convince some more of the theists in the minority. Then there will be a smaller minority that will refuse to treat others as equals. It will be up to someone else to figure out how to deal with them, or just leave them alone.
Comment by Joseph P on October 31, 2011 at 7:45pm
Yeah, but the Objectivists are the most dogmatic of any atheists you'll find. I'd be very careful quoting Ayn Rand.
Comment by AtheistTech on October 31, 2011 at 7:06pm

Joseph -  For those that are mindlessly devout, I agree with what I have as a signature in my emails that I send:

“Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone.” Ayn Rand

Comment by Joseph P on October 31, 2011 at 6:57pm

And when you try that approach, and they don't reciprocate?  I don't think you have as many of the hardcore fundamentalists, up in Michigan.  You have some scary militia groups, but even they aren't as fanatically religious, in general.

 

If you're dealing with someone mindlessly devout, they're not going to budge an inch, and the only value you'll get from arguing with them is demonstrating for the watchers.  Someone who is so brainwashed by one of the cultish pentecostal sects or something similar will only ever be able to free themselves.

Comment by AtheistTech on October 31, 2011 at 6:49pm

All of you have not considered what I deem to be the best course of action:

Check out my post on AN here

 

and here

 

Comment by Joseph P on October 31, 2011 at 6:48pm

I'm a fan of the term 'fractally wrong'.  I don't know if the guys who do Non Prophets Radio and The Atheist Experience made it up, but they use it a lot.

 

Basically, not only are you wrong in general, but if you zoom in on any portion of the thought process and fill in the details, those are pretty much all wrong.  You're wrong every step of the way.

Comment by Scott Bidstrup on October 31, 2011 at 6:43pm

Dr. Meaden wrote:  "...You are not only plain arrogant but you are ignorant to the highest degree."

 

I just tell them that I prefer science to the speculations attributed to ancient tribal sky gods.  That shuts 'em up quite effectively.

Comment by Dr. Terence Meaden on October 31, 2011 at 6:21pm

What is more, here are the words that Byron used:

“Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves.”

 

 

Members (4177)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service