Atheist Nexus Logo

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4174
Latest Activity: 42 minutes ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Bud Light Withdraws Offensive Slogan

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 30. 16 Replies

Dinosaur Highway

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 29. 8 Replies

Evolution is a FACT, not a theory.

Started by Idaho Spud. Last reply by Joseph P Apr 25. 15 Replies

L'homme "blanc" n'existe en Europe que depuis 6500 BC

Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 16. 1 Reply

ORIGIN OF ATHEIST PRIDE

Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 15. 196 Replies

Chimps Seen Making and Using Spears

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Donald L. Engel Apr 14. 3 Replies

Why sex? The evolution of sex

Started by Rick Springfield Apr 12. 0 Replies

Scientists Say not all Traits are Directly from DNA

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Donald L. Engel Apr 5. 6 Replies

Coffee Lowers Risk of Liver Cancer

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Apr 4. 20 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Quinton Llewellyn on February 20, 2015 at 4:32am

I guess the difference is that someone who suffers from an actual mental illness, their delusion stems from a chemical imbalance and the delusion comes from within. Whereas a religious person's delusion is a learnt bias, they have been brainwashed by others outside themselves.

You might find this interesting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyDDyT1lDhA

Comment by LadyWolf on February 20, 2015 at 12:29am

I have always thought it rather ironic that we as a society administer anti-psychotic drugs to those people who have trouble differentiating between actual reality and their own self-created world (i.e., Schizophrenia), yet we in no way consider those who pray to and believe in supernatural entities to have any form of mental illness. A person of "faith" can say that a man walked on water, or that an ark housed every currently-existing animal on earth for an entire year (without the boat having been the size of North America), and yet no one hauls that person off to a padded room. These people can be confronted with one scientific fact after another, and will still refuse to let go of their fantasies. Is this
not the very definition of a mental illness?

Comment by LadyWolf on February 19, 2015 at 2:52am

@Donald L. Engel

Wiccan, yes...it is an excerpt from the Witches Creed by Doreen Valiente.

Comment by Donald L. Engel on February 18, 2015 at 8:26pm

Sounds like Wicken to me.

Comment by Lemual Poot on February 18, 2015 at 6:52pm

'Thirteen silver moons in a year are, 
Thirteen is the coven's array.
Thirteen times at Esbat make merry,
For each golden year and a day.'

Now!  That's old-time religion!

Comment by Quinton Llewellyn on February 18, 2015 at 10:03am

@Joseph P

I have no problem with the desire for a longer life. Although I understand that there is the philosophical weight of existentialism behind the idea that it is that we have a finite life that allows us to value it, if someone offer me a pill that was known to cause the body to maintain the physical age somewhere in the mid-twenties indefinitely, I would totally take it. However, after taking it, I don't see how I would experience a change my life's value or meaning. Of course there are also situations that I can imagine being where I would welcome oblivion, "groveling at the feet of (a) holy master, (condemned to spend my time) praising him for eternity" would be one of them! :)
Still I always got from the whole meaning to life thing that there would be some effect from it, like "a greater reason to life". So for example if you see someone laying down pipes it isn't done so that in the future they can continue to lay down pipes, it's so they can direct water for drinking, cooking and washing to a certain location, or move sewage or something beyond just laying pipes. But it seems, as you say, that the religious folk's reason for worship is so they can carry on worshiping, that has to be the shittest reward ever!

Comment by Joan Denoo on February 18, 2015 at 12:51am

@Dr. Terence Meaden  thanks for the wonderful poem. I am passing it on. 

Richard Le Gallienne's version included

Look not above, there is no answer there;
Pray not, for no one listens to your prayer;
Near is as near to God as any Far,
And Here is just the same deceit as There.

Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam 

(#78, on p. 44)

Comment by Joan Denoo on February 17, 2015 at 4:25pm

Joseph, I like this concept you present, making it possible to reframe the concept and then rebut the statement with clarity and power. 

To think that forever translates into something meaningless, maintains no value, no worth. What good is an individual living with god and all his sycophants when it becomes eternal submission? It grows even more unsavory to my appetite. 

To correlate infinity with value ...

Let's discuss economics for a minute. 

"If a resource is freely available in almost limitless quantity, then it's value drops off to almost nothing."

"New Oxfam report says half of global wealth held by the 1%"

"Considering how the  conservative, religiously-owned party here in the US claims to have a solid grasp of financial matters, they don't understand a damned thing about economics, in reality."

"If you ask them why groveling at the feet of their holy master, praising him for eternity, gives their life meaning ... well, no, I've never heard a coherent explanation."

thanks for calling this to my attention Joseph. 

Comment by Joan Denoo on February 17, 2015 at 2:20pm

Donald, I love "The Rubaiyat". An elderly English gentleman lived in my neighborhood. He had been a Shakespearean actor in England, with a love of poetry. He had long white hair that streamed down his back and very long white beard. Every Thursday in the summer he would come over to my back yard and we had tea in the garden and he read poetry to me. One of my favorites poets was Omar Khayyam. The last year of his life was a horrid one. He was in and out of hospitals and nursing homes. Every Thursday I would go and read to him. I wasn't very skilled and if I got the inflection wrong he corrected me, gently. His wife and children asked if we could have his memorial service in my back yard. What a wonderful gift they gave me. As the sun began to sink in the west, some of the children and their parents were still in the garden as Sirius started to shine. Sirius, the Dog Star is the brightest star (in fact, a star system) in the Earth's night sky. 

The children often were in my garden until almost dark, and we tried to learn all the stars and constellations. So, that evening they began to talk about Roger while Sirius was in the southwestern sky. They renamed it "Roger". He would have been very pleased.

Comment by Joseph P on February 17, 2015 at 2:13pm

@Quinton (again)

I expect most are just grossly ignorant of what evolution actually is and have too much invested in their ignorance to question it.

There are some who remain willfully ignorant of it, sure.  I'm sure that Ray Comfort hasn't allowed it to soak in, no matter how many times he's had it explained to him.  I think he just shuts his ears off and waits for his next turn to preach, when any evolution proponent is speaking.

Others, I'm not so sure, though.  They know that they have to reject the theory of evolution, because if they lose the Doctrine of Original Sin from a literal Garden of Eden, then the whole house of cards leading up to Jesus's redemption of mankind falls apart.

It's similar to the situation of some preachers who are fully aware of the fact that the Gospels are hearsay stories, passed around for decades before being collected and written down by anonymous scribes who weren't the apostles.  They've had formal education with real literary analysis of the Bible, not the unthinking adherence of a fundamentalist seminary.

Yet, those preachers don't mention to their flock all of the damning things that they learned in seminary, because the flock isn't spiritually ready to hear it, or some similarly flimsy excuse.  Likewise, I'm sure that some young-earth creationists have had enough of the actual details of evolution filtered into their brains, but they know that they can't admit those details to their flock and represent evolution honestly, because there will be those in their flock who aren't sufficiently spiritually fortified and will go astray.  So, they continue to lie and straw-man.

I think we're most likely to go astray when trying to guess any given Christian's understanding and motivation, except with the most blatant ones, like Ray Comfort.  There's such a wide variety of samples.

Still, it's fun to muse, as long as you don't try to use your musings to paint someone unfairly.

I know however the Jehovah Witnesses have the Theocratic War Strategy, which essentially means if it will help them in an argument they should lie.

I hadn't specifically heard of that in regards to the Jehovah's Witnesses, but I've heard similar from other quarters.  I think Sye Ten Bruggencate has said, at various times, that he doesn't have to deal honestly with anyone who isn't saved.  Also, he'll only debate theology with someone who has accepted a literal, fundamentalist reading of the Bible.

The guy's mind must be a bag full of cats.

The religious who knowingly lie will sometime justify it with the idea that if it saves a person from damnation it's for the greater good; this was the same justification I believe the Spanish Inquisition had for burning people alive - when morality is based on the well being of people's supposed afterlife instead their well being here and now, it is possible for anything to become permissible.

As someone who largely adopts an ends-justify-the-means mentality, this sort of thing is particularly troubling.  They're leaving out the second part of the process.  If the ends justify the means, then the means also have to justify the ends.  Otherwise, you end up with a grossly imbalanced equation.

To put it another way, if you're having to go to horrific, morally abhorrent means in order to accomplish your ends, you should really go back and take a look at what that says about your goals.

 

Members (4174)

 
 
 

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service