We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4123
Latest Activity: 10 hours ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Experimental Ebola Serum May Be In Use On Americans

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky 10 hours ago. 23 Replies

Thigh Bone on Mars?

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by ShroudedAtheist on Tuesday. 19 Replies

Religion the virus of society

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Luara on Monday. 60 Replies

Scientific Adam and Eve

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Joseph P on Saturday. 19 Replies


Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by TNT666 on Saturday. 43 Replies

show-off and picky intelligence

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Rick Springfield Aug 20. 19 Replies

Science is God

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Jonathan Tweet Aug 16. 9 Replies

Intelligent But Makes an Exception for Religion

Started by Brian Edward Croner. Last reply by Jonathan Tweet Aug 15. 67 Replies

Armored Dinosaur

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Joseph P Aug 15. 16 Replies

Rosetta Spacecraft

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Patricia Aug 9. 5 Replies

New Nazca Lines Found in Peru

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Joseph P Aug 8. 2 Replies

Why Does Prince George Have Brown Eyes?

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by The Devian Jul 24. 8 Replies

Evolution and consciousness

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Susan Stanko Jul 22. 4 Replies

If the probability of evolution is zero the sun will not shine

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Dorian Moises Mattar Jul 20. 2 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Ogden Lafaye on December 1, 2009 at 9:14am
We have the science Larry, from every field of inquiry, we HAVE laid it on the simply choose to ignore it. You are, in every way, a FunDummie and you are employing their argument style in every respect.
Comment by Ogden Lafaye on December 1, 2009 at 9:11am
Actually, there has never been a time when everyone thought the world was flat. However, there will always be ignorant people who believe the world is flat and that global warming by the people is fallacious.
Comment by Ogden Lafaye on December 1, 2009 at 9:09am
The sentence is out of context but I feel the intent is not responsible to the future...excuse the out of context post, corrections are not possible in these replies for some reason.
Comment by Ogden Lafaye on December 1, 2009 at 9:07am
It won't affect me so why should I care?...hard to misunderstand that Larry.

We all have a duty to the future.
Comment by Ogden Lafaye on December 1, 2009 at 9:05am
"The power needs of the US, RIGHT NOW (without allowing for any increase) would require the building of 8,400 nuclear power plants."

This is obviously an error.
Comment by Ogden Lafaye on November 30, 2009 at 10:22pm
Well Rudy, this garbage is just as evident and equally abundant in the air as on earth. Therefore it is a climate issue. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it disappeared into leftist gaga land.
Comment by Rudy V Kiist on November 30, 2009 at 6:59pm
Again though, I think we need to stress more what Ogden was talking about, (even the "uneducated" can see that) because you don't get a lot of sympathy for GW up here. The difference between -40 warming up to -38 = still damn cold for us northerners LOL. You must understand, in my country the average temp can be a 5 degree Celsius difference depending on the area, but the environment is exactly the same (plant and animal species) therefore they don't see 2 degrees being a big deal. Most people don't look past their own backyard.
Comment by Rudy V Kiist on November 30, 2009 at 4:40pm
I agree 100% with what you wrote Ogden, but to fair to Larry, none of that had anything to do with climate. Pollution and deforestation, yes. Being a farmer, I witness fellow land owners knocking down trees and plowing up native pasture on a yearly basis, but that's another topic. And I've already mention we have a SEVERE problem with pollution.

As for global warming I'm still waiting for more definitive evidence like Larry. It's the old "tree in the forest" dilemma. Yes we witness things like ice caps breaking off in the Acrtic, but the question remains, did it count if it happened back in the 18th or 19th century when no one was there to record it? In other words many argue due to technology and communication we simply know of and are able to find out about easier.

What scares me is over reaction. I hear scientists suggesting dumping MORE crap in the atmosphere or putting up "shades" to block the sun to counteract GW. No ones going to convince me they know exactly what the results are going to be when we start screwing around with the atmosphere on purpose. Too many variables involved.

Don't get me wrong, when it comes to GW, I also believe it's "better to be safe than sorry", but we can also make things worse if we're not careful.
Comment by Ogden Lafaye on November 30, 2009 at 2:13pm
Well Larry, it is a long foregone conclusion and yes, obvious, obvious to those paying attention to the news and understanding what is being discovered and how it relates back to mankind's polluting.

If you are depending on the earth's ability to absorb this punishment and evidences of changes in the past you might look at the rapidity of these changes as compared to natural events past such as "mini ice ages" long term heat rises and falls into cold periods.

The increased respiratory disease rates are rather dramatic as well as the fact that nose hairs are increasing as evidenced by the rather stunning studies of monkeys in the New York Zoo. I know you may be amused but then some of the data I have personally correlated is wayyyyyyy out there and yet, the "standard" available data is an explanation.

I have watched the changes over 70 years. I can remember when there were trees and pastures, creeks and wild animals in areas of America that are now desolate patches. National Geographic dedicated a number of articles to the phenomena of water loss in various areas of the United States, interviewing "old timers" for corroboration. We just don't seem to notice because to a humna, the chages are so gradual. But to historical change, the changes are extremely rapid in the 20th century to now.

I sailed the oceans most of my life and I assure you, you cannot go ANYWHERE on water anymore without seeing trash in the ocean...there are NO stretches of water without a piece of trash within view 24/7...and I have ventured the 7 seas repeatedly. The Persian Gulf, that enormous body of water has NO shoreline vegetation for miles in, there are no birds in the sky or on the water, no other animals, no evidence of sea life other than the occasional fisherman; now almost a thing of the past. Their harbors have huge areas piled with trash that are not navigable.

Ships at sea use sea water to cool their propulsion machinery and the cleaning of filters is a constant task, oft repeated daily. The birds that used to follow our ships all the way across the oceans (albatrosses) are gone. Few sea birds survive whereas as a young man, they were everywhere. The porposises used to ride our bow wave and we could talk to them and they would heed our whistles, rolling on their backs to see us, keeping up with the shup...very very rare these days and the 100's upon 100's of porposises are now a scant few. Whales were everywhere, no more.

The fishing in my native Louisiana was fantastic as a child but not anymore. Believe it or not there were 1/2+ lb. shrimp in the Mississippi River once...gone, not even recorded. I swam in the river as a child, swimming out to anchored timber ships and getting invited on board for coffee and a tour. Now you are covered with grime and oil, suffer sores and rashes...totally polluted and devoid of life in New Orleans. The Gulf of Mexico once harbored a great shrimp and crab population, now virtually non-existent...the bounty was plentiful, so much so that the beaches had feral cats that fished in the shallow waters and we would go out at night and spear flounder (fish) with the aid of a hurricane lamp, picking up soft shell crabs after ascertaining they were soft with our spears, and hand casting nets into the myriad swarms of shrimp and schooling fish that were EVERYWHERE. You could catch large trout at night with a hook and a sliver of white cotton cloth, dragging this in the well lit water off of piers that had advertising signs. No More...alas.

Our 40 acres in the middle of nowhere USA was once covered with fir trees, a creek and animals. Now we haul water from a spring 300 yards away, cut gnarly stunted scrub oak for firewood and celebrate the hoot of an owl or the sudden flight of a bird. The few scrawny coyotes eat our garbage for want of wild fare (they LIKE beans).

In Los Angeles? Want to get away from the smog and pollution? You now have to drive 150+ miles in ANY direction to escape it.

Look around you Larry: We have loaded the atmosphere, the waters and the land with garbage...what more proof do you want?
Comment by Ogden Lafaye on November 30, 2009 at 1:42pm to some galactic influence, other than gravitic, I see the atmosphere as a rather effective material barrier, rather like wrapping a beignet in powdered sugar and whipping far as particulate matter goes.

Gravitic influences would show up in measurements of distance from the sun and the speeding up or slowing down of our rotational speed.

Now as to aliens...laughter. I understand they have attached a tow rope to our galaxy and the stars we see now are a clever projection (like Photo Shop) to make us think our galaxy isn't moving into their realm. All conjecture of course.

Of course!

Members (4122)


Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon




© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service