Atheist Nexus Logo

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4178
Latest Activity: 6 minutes ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Genetically Engineered Fungi are Part Human and Part Yeast

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Donald L. Engel on Saturday. 1 Reply

Drug Rejuvenates Stem Cell Functioning in Old Mice

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gerald Payne May 15. 10 Replies

Fossilized Brain

Started by Patricia May 11. 0 Replies

Bud Light Withdraws Offensive Slogan

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 30. 16 Replies

Dinosaur Highway

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Gerald Payne Apr 29. 8 Replies

Evolution is a FACT, not a theory.

Started by Idaho Spud. Last reply by Joseph P Apr 25. 15 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Dr. Cowboy on November 17, 2010 at 8:42pm
It's entirely plausible that Jesus actually existed. However, considering that the gospels were written around 100 AD or so, it's unlikely that he even remotely resembles the person (or persons, rather) portrayed there. There's an interesting documentary on the Gospel of Judas (available via Netflix streaming if you have it). It turns out there were something like 35 gospels floating around before the church decided to whittle it down to 4 and declare the rest heresy.
Comment by Jennifer R on November 17, 2010 at 8:39pm
There are plenty of books and documentaries refuting the historical existence of Jesus of Nazareth. In fact...there may never have even been a Nazareth. Here is a website. http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm

An interesting documentary on the subject I saw recently was The God Who Wasn't There.
Comment by Tony Davis on November 17, 2010 at 8:22pm
LOL are you guys talking about "The Life of Brian"? Great movie! I think my favorite part was when they went before Pontius Pilate and he had a speech impediment and said his "Rs" like "Ws", so he would up releasing "Bawabas".

On a more serious note, the idea of Jesus being a breed of people and folks recognizing him.... One thing I find very interesting is how nobody recognized him at first after his resurrection, even after walking some distance and talking to him, or sitting down to eat with him. And no good reason is given for this that I am aware of.
Comment by Susan Stanko on November 17, 2010 at 5:07pm
Didn't Monty Python do that?
Comment by Mark M on November 17, 2010 at 4:54pm
Ron Cole,

I, too, am of the opinion that the Jesus of the Bible was a real person. I think that he was one of the myriad self-proclaimed prophets roaming the region at the time, and he won the eternal notoriety lottery.
Comment by Mark M on November 17, 2010 at 4:51pm
*surprised, *interment
Comment by Mark M on November 17, 2010 at 4:50pm
well, the absence of evidence certainly isn't evidence of absence, so i would say the fact that we don't have a lot of archaeological evidence of crucifixion victims doesn't necessarily mean that we can assume that it was their policy to never allow the family to bury them. for the record, all I know about Roman practice regarding the bodies of their executed comes from your previous post and from having seen a few movies and history channel documentaries about Rome, so if your knowledge of these matters makes my argument a weak one I would not be surprisd. it might help to know how common intermet was in the various communities under roman rule. also, I would find it difficult to believe that mid-level legal authorities taking bribes was anything but common.
Comment by Bryon on November 17, 2010 at 4:04pm
conceivable perhaps but unlikely. If he existed, he would most likely would have been executed for insurrection or some such thing and would not have been allowed a respectful burial. not to mention that the archeological evidence would indicate that the Romans were not in the habit of taking bribes for such things.
Comment by Mark M on November 17, 2010 at 2:08pm
Byron,

Just saw this post while dicking around at work, so I ran it by a Christian colleague of mine. He pointed out that Joseph of Arimathaea came to Pilate the day after the crucifixion and paid Pilate to have the body removed to his custody. This is concieveable, as it would represent a bribe. In the case of Vercingetorix, it makes sense that a bribe wouldn't be honored as he was an enemy of the state, but for a petty criminal to be removed from the cross isn't outside the realm of possibility.
Comment by Tony Davis on November 17, 2010 at 10:47am
Bryon,

Thanks so much for taking the time to read, and comment on, my articles. It is one thing for me to blather on about what I think on certain topics, but to have others like you commenting really adds a lot to it!

VR,
Tony
 

Members (4178)

 
 
 

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service