ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4153
Latest Activity: 6 hours ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by sk8eycat 6 hours ago. 13 Replies

Organic Material Found on Mars

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Patricia yesterday. 1 Reply

Pope Says Animals go to Heaven

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Lemual Poot on Wednesday. 24 Replies

Alzheimer's Reversed in Mice

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Loren Miller on Monday. 2 Replies

Pope Says Animals go to Heaven

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Plinius Dec 11. 2 Replies

42,000 Year Old Flute

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Jay Stride Dec 10. 2 Replies

Ebola Spreads to U.S.

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Dec 10. 9 Replies

540,000 Year Old Artwork

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Dr. Terence Meaden Dec 9. 15 Replies

Hawking Likes Film on His Life

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Grinning Cat Nov 29. 3 Replies

Very Ancient Sharks Teeth Found

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Joseph P Nov 29. 3 Replies

Ancient Footprints

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Patricia Nov 22. 2 Replies

empathizing–systemizing

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Joan Denoo Nov 18. 6 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Shoe on January 6, 2009 at 2:21pm
I've been waiting for that dang book ever since I read "Mapping Mars". It's finally available on Amazon! (I think it's been available in the UK for, like, years.)
Comment by Richard Healy on January 2, 2009 at 4:51am
Sounds interesting, Don.

*adds it to the list*
Comment by crabsallover on December 31, 2008 at 7:38am
I'm giving a talk on Darwin, Science & Humanist in York on 9th Feb and again in Bournemouth on 12th Feb (Darwin Day). I'd be interested in anyone with Powerpoint presentations on these topics.

www.HASSERS.org
Comment by Rosemary LYNDALL WEMM on December 31, 2008 at 12:35am
The evolution of man ....

http://www.ahajokes.com/crt145.html
Comment by Alex Donovan on December 21, 2008 at 10:49am
The Worldwide Council of Churches once had statistics on its website. It was somewhere around 38,000 denominations, last time I checked.
You'd think that since they all claim 'divine guidance by the Holy Spirit,' they'd get their act together and agree on something.
Comment by Alex Donovan on December 21, 2008 at 10:33am
Exactly, Mario. Claiming that there is something in consciousness that exists independent of the brain is like claiming that you could somehow snatch the software out of a computer into the air and it would still be able to run programs.
Comment by Alex Donovan on December 21, 2008 at 10:31am
Zerosmelt...you should probably try reading the book before you make yourself look silly.
Comment by Mario Romero on December 20, 2008 at 10:39am
Ok, reading the last post I can not help but congratulate myself for finding this site. I know I'm happy about it.

As for what Richard said, attacks on neuroscience are just the latest trend in the attack on science. Neuroscience is after all the study of the various aspects of the fisical brain, try to discredite those studies and sometime you'll find yourself attacking the very root of science, since it is done by the use of our braiins. I don't think it's just related to the dichotomy of naturalism and materialism. Try to convince the people that scientists don't understand the brain and don't know how to actually use it, and people will find themselves doubting just about everything that scientists say.
Comment by Richard Healy on December 19, 2008 at 4:48pm
My impression of the attacks on neuroscience is that it is even more treacherous than that. It's an attempt, I think, to establish a viable dualism to place against the naturalism and methodological materialism of science. I say viable in the same way that 'teach the controversy' in the I.D imbroglio isn't valid as science but it is there to try and erode the popular understanding of accepted scientific knowledge by positing a rival claim. In other circumstances this would be almost fine if they could produce any evidence for their claims, but they never can.

The purpose behind the neuroscience attacks seems to be try to establish some non-natural causation which is to argue on their part that the mind is not just what the brain does.

The consequences of this should be obvious: a backdoor way of considering natural and non natural causation as equal, separation of material and non material events which would have implications for questions of supernatural causes, and I suppose life after death (that conscious activity ceases when brain function ceases etc.)

And this neatly fits into the same pattern of Intelligent Design and the infamous Wedge document of seeking to overturn the consequences of naturalism and as part and parcel of this rejection that our minds (as a function of our brains) are formed by natural selection and evolution. So in this way it's a continuation of the same old agenda by different means.

The point is neuroscience is still seeking the answers to how our brains work and shows reasonably reliably that altering brain states affects mental states.

And this is the evidence that we must confront these IDiots with.

I have found the blog Neurologica very instructive in this regard.

http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/
Comment by Gary A. Gabbard on December 18, 2008 at 7:18pm
Science is investigating the origins of religious thinking.
You will notice, more and more, religious attacks aimed at neuroscience rather than just evolution. That is the reaction of those (religious) keeping up with scientific discovery.
Much like all other fields, the religious are threatened by the truths being uncovered.
It's another nail in the coffin, and they know it.
 

Members (4153)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

Future replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
22 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
50 minutes ago
Michael Penn commented on nikki summers's blog post atheist billboard
1 hour ago
Michael Penn replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
1 hour ago
John Jubinsky posted photos
1 hour ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is god good?
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
5 hours ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
5 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
6 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
6 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
6 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service