We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4055
Latest Activity: yesterday

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Strange Science

Started by Sven Andersson. Last reply by Francis Kamuyu yesterday. 17 Replies

Movie - Stephen Hawking's Life with First Wife

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky on Sunday. 2 Replies

New Way to Genetically Treat Diseases

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Apr 4. 5 Replies

Atheist activism

Started by Madhukar Kulkarni. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 27. 5 Replies

Quantum Entanglement and Faster than Light Travel

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Mar 24. 15 Replies

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Jim Pigeon Mar 22. 42 Replies

The "Cute" T-Rex

Started by Patricia Mar 14. 0 Replies

Scientists Say Some People Indifferent to Music

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gregory Phillip Dearth Mar 14. 5 Replies

The 'Most High' father of Yahweh

Started by Madhukar Kulkarni. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 5. 26 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Richard Healy on December 19, 2008 at 4:48pm
My impression of the attacks on neuroscience is that it is even more treacherous than that. It's an attempt, I think, to establish a viable dualism to place against the naturalism and methodological materialism of science. I say viable in the same way that 'teach the controversy' in the I.D imbroglio isn't valid as science but it is there to try and erode the popular understanding of accepted scientific knowledge by positing a rival claim. In other circumstances this would be almost fine if they could produce any evidence for their claims, but they never can.

The purpose behind the neuroscience attacks seems to be try to establish some non-natural causation which is to argue on their part that the mind is not just what the brain does.

The consequences of this should be obvious: a backdoor way of considering natural and non natural causation as equal, separation of material and non material events which would have implications for questions of supernatural causes, and I suppose life after death (that conscious activity ceases when brain function ceases etc.)

And this neatly fits into the same pattern of Intelligent Design and the infamous Wedge document of seeking to overturn the consequences of naturalism and as part and parcel of this rejection that our minds (as a function of our brains) are formed by natural selection and evolution. So in this way it's a continuation of the same old agenda by different means.

The point is neuroscience is still seeking the answers to how our brains work and shows reasonably reliably that altering brain states affects mental states.

And this is the evidence that we must confront these IDiots with.

I have found the blog Neurologica very instructive in this regard.
Comment by Gary A. Gabbard on December 18, 2008 at 7:18pm
Science is investigating the origins of religious thinking.
You will notice, more and more, religious attacks aimed at neuroscience rather than just evolution. That is the reaction of those (religious) keeping up with scientific discovery.
Much like all other fields, the religious are threatened by the truths being uncovered.
It's another nail in the coffin, and they know it.
Comment by Dr. Terence Meaden on December 18, 2008 at 12:24pm
Hanna J., we are very glad to have you join.

This is where the core substance of atheism is: finding the reasons why the world is what it is, from the origins of the cosmos to the origins of humans and their thinking and behaviour.

Science and commonsense can prove it all, which is a great contrast to the 'goddidit' nonsense coming from the indoctrinated religionists.
Comment by Alfredo Rebello on December 18, 2008 at 9:40am
I am happy for being able to participate of a group with great possibility of high level quarrels .
Comment by Hanna J. on December 17, 2008 at 9:54pm
I am overjoyed to see such an interest in this group!
Comment by linda wagner on December 17, 2008 at 6:34pm
I have a question about churches. Has anybody done a surrey to see where the the most churches are in the US and where the least amount are. Accourding to population.
Comment by wafi on December 14, 2008 at 7:43am
DARWIN is daa man !!!
Comment by DUBsays®... on December 4, 2008 at 4:49pm
Yes, I've heard 40k.
Comment by Gary A. Gabbard on November 28, 2008 at 3:47pm
Someone once told me that it was in the range of 30,000.
I'm afraid I can't site a ref. for that though.
I say engage the mighty google. That should get you nearer your answer.
Comment by Brian on November 28, 2008 at 3:22pm
Does anyone know how many denominations of christianity there are? I am trying to prove a point to a methodist friend

Members (4055)


Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon



© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service