ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 3866
Latest Activity: 11 hours ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

What if Richard Dawkins wasn't polite?

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner 11 hours ago. 8 Replies

The revealing laryngeal nerve

Started by Napoleon Bonaparte. Last reply by Fanghur1123 on Sunday. 1 Reply

More on Otzi the Iceman

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Joan Denoo on Friday. 1 Reply

Younger Dryas was caused by impact

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Natalie A Sera May 28. 1 Reply

Part Human Part Ape Possible Ancester Analized

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky May 16. 7 Replies

Male upper body strength, evolution, & politics

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by leveni May 16. 1 Reply

Scientists Say Minoans Were European

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky May 15. 2 Replies

Protein Reverses Heart Failure in Mice

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by leveni May 10. 3 Replies

SCIENCE FINDS GOD!

Started by Madhukar Kulkarni. Last reply by Chris Breman May 8. 35 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Dr. Terence Meaden on January 20, 2009 at 9:08am
http://www.atheistnexus.org/group/originsuniverselifehumankindanddarwin/forum/topics/2182797:Topic:110343

You can shift this discussion if you wish to another part of this group's discussion area as prompted by the Big Question, "What happened before the Big Bang?".
Although we can never know, we can try approaching possible answers through applying the known laws of physics. One possibility that I find attractive has been well discussed by Vic Stenger. I wrote a piece about this, and sent it to Vic Stenger for comment (with which he agreed). The URL is
http://www.atheistnexus.org/group/originsuniverselifehumankindanddarwin/forum/topics/2182797:Topic:110343

http://www.atheistnexus.org/group/originsuniverselifehumankindanddarwin/forum/topics/2182797:Topic:110343
Comment by Marcus Tullius Cicero on January 20, 2009 at 8:21am
Strong AP: the laws of physics are biased toward life or, as Dyson is reported to have once said, the universe was aware that we were coming.

Andrei Linde, recently. Brandon Carter, in the 70's. John Polkinghorne, recently. Steven Weinberg, Nobel Laureate. There are others.

When one discusses a theory or paradigm it does not necessarily mean he believes it to be true. It is a thought experiment. Relax, take off the boxing gloves, and join us in the land of cool cogitation.
(:
Comment by Alex Donovan on January 20, 2009 at 7:29am
" how do we deal with the large number of theoretical physicists who have arrived at the "strong" Anthropic Principle as a result of their scientific, not theological, research? "

Can you name some of these scientists, and what their claims are? Are you aware of what the Anthropic Principle REALLY states?
Comment by Tedster on January 20, 2009 at 12:25am
To yes, I agree. God didn't make me an atheist, he isn't around to do it. This gives to good conversation starters.
Comment by Marcus Tullius Cicero on January 19, 2009 at 7:35pm
A new thread to pursue in "Origins": how do we deal with the large number of theoretical physicists who have arrived at the "strong" Anthropic Principle as a result of their scientific, not theological, research? These are brilliant men, some of whom are Nobel Laureates. Others have said that if there is only one universe, not a multiverse, then a conscious fine-tuner is needed. Another has said that consciousness may be a fundamental component of the universe, that a conscious observer is necessary for it to exist.

Oh, the problems we have! Just wait until this hits the lay press!
Comment by Mario Romero on January 19, 2009 at 2:26pm
No! please, don't cry,,, last time it lasted for, like, 40 days and nights and we ended up with GOP and Billy O'Riley!
Comment by God on January 19, 2009 at 1:33am
I am not a troll, and the mere suggestion of such is deeply hurtful to Me, who have sacrificed so much of Myself for all of you.

If you knew Me you would love Me!
(goes into corner of Heaven to weep uncontrollably)
Comment by Leslee Love on January 18, 2009 at 11:16pm
Can we please get over this troll (A troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, with the intention of provoking other users into an emotional response or disrupt conversation) crap. This is not the intent of this mature, intellectual, and brilliant group. God is simply being God. I believe Dr. Meaden should be the one to handle this, if he sees so inclined to do so, after all it is his group.
Comment by Leslee Love on January 18, 2009 at 11:06pm
yea, I'm not an internet deprived atheist...
Comment by Leslee Love on January 17, 2009 at 8:13am
I agree with Susan.
 

Members (3866)

 
 
 
MJ

Latest Activity

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service